With today's Supreme Court decision, cake makers in the United States are no longer compelled to make cakes with Nazi insignia just because customers want it. Creators have freedom of speech, and can now opt to not provide said services against their wishes.

Yes, it's true. But think about what would have happened without the vaccine?

I actually had the same thought and expected this to be one of the first answers.

It's definitely harder to physically oppress an armed population with firearms on the same level as the state military.

next episode sunday 8pm est: manson

#conspiracydimensions ✨

Exactly.

And obviously the US healthcare system has its own set of very real issues, but in the majority of the western world, there is a private health insurance system that also has subsidies for the poor which ensure everyone has equal access.

And the state doesn't need to run anything.

These countries (Switzerland, Germany, pretty much all of Europe) have healthcare systems so superior that the number of people in the UK who go abroad for surgery etc grows annually.

The reason they don't use the private system here is usually cost. Because the NHS exists, private healthcare is a luxury good in the UK. In countries where it's necessary, naturally it's cheaper.

Notably if you go to any private hospital or clinic in the UK you will see a lot of Arabs and signs in Arabic etc. Rich Arabs come to London for private healthcare all the time.

As I said, the quality of the actual doctors and nurses is not the issue. When working privately they have much less stress and much more freedom.

Why freedom? On the NHS, doctors aren't allowed to use their own judgement. They must follow government guidelines to the letter. Often these are corrupt (Big Pharma pay the government regulators to change guidelines in their favour) but they must be followed or that doc is personally liable.

Privately, the guidelines are just guidelines. Docs can treat their patients however they feel is best.

Guess which approach ends in better care?

Final point: the crazy thing is lefties want to shut down private healthcare because it's "unfair." The state has brainwashed em against their own interests. If anything they should campaign to shut down the NHS so everyone has access to the quality of care provided by private healthcare.

As my own dad said to me: if you had to use the NHS you'd be dead.

Yup.

Exactly.

And obviously the US healthcare system has its own set of very real issues, but in the majority of the western world, there is a private health insurance system that also has subsidies for the poor which ensure everyone has equal access.

And the state doesn't need to run anything.

These countries (Switzerland, Germany, pretty much all of Europe) have healthcare systems so superior that the number of people in the UK who go abroad for surgery etc grows annually.

The reason they don't use the private system here is usually cost. Because the NHS exists, private healthcare is a luxury good in the UK. In countries where it's necessary, naturally it's cheaper.

Notably if you go to any private hospital or clinic in the UK you will see a lot of Arabs and signs in Arabic etc. Rich Arabs come to London for private healthcare all the time.

As I said, the quality of the actual doctors and nurses is not the issue. When working privately they have much less stress and much more freedom.

Why freedom? On the NHS, doctors aren't allowed to use their own judgement. They must follow government guidelines to the letter. Often these are corrupt (Big Pharma pay the government regulators to change guidelines in their favour) but they must be followed or that doc is personally liable.

Privately, the guidelines are just guidelines. Docs can treat their patients however they feel is best.

Guess which approach ends in better care?

Final point: the crazy thing is lefties want to shut down private healthcare because it's "unfair." The state has brainwashed em against their own interests. If anything they should campaign to shut down the NHS so everyone has access to the quality of care provided by private healthcare.

As my own dad said to me: if you had to use the NHS you'd be dead.

Yup.

I almost want to learn latin to read things like De Architectura in its original form. I’m super impressed by builders from antiquity. Wondering what can be learned from them. Maybe even in relation to software architecture:

Strength: code quality and robustness

Utility: does the code actually does something useful

Beauty: aesthetics and ux

People were thinking about these things for a long time before us, and the things they build still stand today and are beautiful. We’ve lost a lot of wisdom.

We can. But police will determine and search for threats

I don’t even notice I’m doing it most of the time, but I run marshmallow tests on my kids all day long.

Conditioning them to think long term and delay gratification.

This unconscious conditioning will run in the background and be a foundational building block for their future.

When they meet a fork in the road they will choose the longer/harder path.

I will underwrite the journey by providing resources and a safety net.

They will have an invisible hand guiding them and softening the harder/longer path.

Even if I’m dead at that point, my voice will run in the background providing gentle guidance and reassurance that they are on the right path.

This is the real inter-generational wealth.

The sats they will receive are merely icing on the cake.

BCH can suck it

For me underwear is to protect my balls from rubbing against jeans 🐶🐾🤣

Shapeshifting

Because then I could shapeshift into something that could fly, or shoot lasers out of my eyes, or be a chameleon, or basically any other superpower

#superpowerhack #zapmezbd

GM! No shame in nakedness! 🐶🐾🫂☕️💜🤣🥃🥃🥃

We can. But police will determine and search for threats

Yeah if you can’t trust RFK … you will have a extreme issue picking a different candidate. Who else speaks so boldly against the establishment

I am genuinely curious about this. I have an open mind on this issue.

Firearms. Aside from the culture surrounding them in the US as a "god given right", what is the benefit to you as an individual citizen of owning a rifle?

Is it for hunting or the shooting range or do you feel you need that level of firepower for protection?

To give some background on where I'm coming from: I'm a Brit, so no guns here unless you're a farmer or a criminal who can get them anyway, but I'm also in favour of individual freedom and could see the benefit of a handgun for protection.

While rifles undoubtedly look cool, I can't see what practical benefits they offer the individual especially wrt personal protection, so I'm honestly curious to hear views on this - from Americans and other widely armed countries like Switzerland etc.