A new U.S. law gives the president extensive authority to block access to digital assets, raising concerns about its broad implications. Critics, like Scott Johnsson, argue it enables the president to ban any digital asset protocol deemed linked to foreign sanctions violators, compelling users to KYC-compliant blockchains. The law defines digital assets broadly and allows blocking transactions with foreign entities supporting terrorism, significantly impacting user access and control over digital assets.
No surprise here, lady liberty needs her tax revenue. Credible threat is a signal of formidable momentum. Keep up the good work, plebs! #bitcoin
Man or bear? Man, assuredly man.
Fewer people run for office after a local paper goes down and the cost of municipal financing goes up – apparently you don’t care as much about the kind of deal you get if no one is reporting on it. I spoke to a city councilman who saw a marked difference in the behavior at meetings when a reporter stopped coming; people started saying and doing things they never would have done with a reporter present. The quality of government goes down. ~Andrew Yang
It’s important to eat what you find fulfilling, just less often when you are trying to lose weight. Good for you!
I talk to so many people who are spending significant effort and discipline to lose weight. It’s unfortunate that these efforts and intents are often crushed by failure due to a lack of understanding about how our biological systems change their relationship with diet and lifestyle over time. I hope some of these numerous individual conversations help to enable some of these people to change their lifestyles in meaningful and fulfilling ways. ❤️
Who are you voting for?
Bobby Kennedy vows to pardon Edward Snowden and Julian Assange upon election. #rfkjr #freeassange #assange
Absolutely, where lifestyle funding sources are concerned, these choices being civil liberties possessed by citizens, presidential candidates should be required to abrogate those liberties in my opinion to maintain neutrality in a position of power.
I doubt candidates or sitting presidents have any meaningful privacy once the secret service is involved.
I doubt presidents have any practical freedom of expression during or after the presidency.
I think it is reasonable that these sacrifices and others be made to apply for and achieve the post of leadership in our country. Being a public servant is a privilege and a burden if done well, and certainly it requires exactly the right person. Most historical leaders who were great suffered and sacrificed, some of them paid with their lives for the honor of serving their people.
More research is needed to flesh out the concept, but personally these are my expectations and our current system is a circus that serves itself at the expense of the people.
Yep, humidity is difficult. I’ve mostly always lived where it is hot and dry.
Wet cotton pulls an amazing amount of heat from a person’s body. In the winter it’s a huge factor in hypothermia deaths, during the summer it’s pure bliss.
Ok, I’m curious who you advocate for? Are you one of these people who just wants to watch it all burn and laugh? Granted, there is no perfect candidate, but picking the lesser of the three prime evils seems important to me?
I don’t disagree with you, but let’s start with small changes that we can accomplish with a united front? If the people demand a fair platform for elections the government will comply or else. We need to stop the infighting and start making changes collectively. Divided we have no power.
I’d like to see the American flags flying at full mast consistently. Let’s work together to cast community dissent on behavior that tarnishes our morale and patriotism. It isn’t the job of law enforcement, it is the job of the people. Do whatever it takes to prevent the few from ruining this country for the many. #USA #community #patriotism
I think it isn’t all Bobby, but I do think it is important that people take the time to review what he is saying. There is a concerted effort to silence his campaign for a few reasons, none of which are particularly good for the people of the United States.
Isn’t it the only way to ensure that the elected serve the constituency and not special interests though? It’s the only idea I have for now…