More or less, yeah. And at that level you’re left with ancap or agorist, if not pure anarchist - any of which takes more marshaling of personal responsibility than most would prefer, instead opting for society carrying them. Entropy is a bitch.
Anarchy is disentropic, both voluntaristic anarchy and violent anarchy.
Exactly. It’s understandable and unfortunate but definitely a better to and fro than what normies see as a to/fro between left and right versions of statism.
💯!!! Calling out conflation of bitcoin’s ability to provide free market rails and people thinking their agreement to consensus means it’s suddenly belongs to them enough to tell others how to virtuously act with it while claiming any form anarchism.
To everything you said, i agree. Not state power, consensus power. Power being an overall incorrect term but I’ll roll with it. Many bitcoiners bitch about inscriptions on the bitcoin network ‘forcing me to store their data on my node’ all while within consensus rules they agreed to. Technically not ‘their network’ and their argument is purely narrative, but that is literally my point to their principles. Not to say all do, but a number do and it stands out.
₿可₿非恆₿
#ticktock
#nextblock
True, but umbrel runs on separate OS using containers. StartOS is the OS (also free to downlod) and can run on any x86_64 machine, so you have better hardware than raspberrypi, which is not good for server and is more insecure. Any old computer with startOS will likely be better than raspberrypi with umbrel. I’ve run a decade old nuc and a raspberrypi side by side, no question raspberrypi is miserable with both startOS or umbrel.
StartOS on an older computer would be better than anything on a raspberrypi.
It’s the exact same with ancaps, all free market till you put spam on their network 🤣
So here is the thing, when the baby boomers finally lose control of the political institutions the first two things that are going to have to happen is:
1: The country will go on a Bitcoin Standard and
2: The only thing fiat currency will be used for is to pay for entitlement programs like Social Security. We wont take that away from them, but the dollars will basically be worthless.
Reality comes for us all in the end.
https://img-s-msn-com.akamaized.net/tenant/amp/entityid/AA1mwEzA.img
Fiat-slavery incoming for those with real money!
That’s why the ‘a’ or ‘s’ for singular/plural will stick around for the wealthy, might even see the ‘s’ on the singular instead of retaining the ‘a’:
.01 bitcoins = 1000000 sats
2 bitcoins = 200000000 sats
While everyone else uses bitcoin for singular and plural:
1 bitcoin = 1 sat
25000 bitcoin = 25000 sats
As much as I don’t like the sound of that, that is where the logic leads.
Perhaps the distinction will show between ‘one’ and ‘a’
1 bitcoin = 1 sat
A bitcoin = 100000000 sats
Language gets weird, sometimes.
Said it before, and I will say it again.
Language separated by wealth
Normal people will ‘have bitcoin’ and use it as the plural for sats (or w/e you want to call them)
A bitcoin or bitcoins, with the ‘A’ or ‘S’, will reference whole coin(s/ers) denoting wealth
The ambiguity on club here is phenomenal
まだ中国語で日本語の漢字を読んでるんだが#nostrasia のためでもう日本語がリスタート勉強始まりたいよ〜！