Retrying with color since those others don’t show in dark mode.. derm

Creation nostr:note1uwgsp8hlax3szg7tahc6cdgddq3dg9efpwj5dqyzm5kx643028qqeptphm

👀

planck time 📏 block height

Blockspace

Blocktime

Spacetime

Blockchain

Timechain

Block mining

Crystal mining

Time crystal

Time crystal mining

Timechain mining

… to be continued

Didn’t even finish reading your comment before thinking ‘dope’

But… 58k?… 👀

This is cool to watch

Selfishness is usually not looked upon highly

Ummmmm… nostr:npub153xmex42x4chdf757hp3q6zxagykkek7pdgwuwd074964dkyha9s82ryu8 is this how you plan to release satoshi reserve? 👀

Not sure if i ever has ogs; i mostly was on kgs, every now and then tygem.

Missed this, great idea

That’s a concept derived from an interplay on four, if not all five, of those in relation to network use-cases - out of scope. Most bitcoiners’ fundamentals are so flawed they would not be able to effectively engage in the discussion. When core concepts are incorrect, the derivatives will likely exacerbate the inaccuracy of translation/composition thereof.

Five things most bitcoiners don’t understand but discuss when talking about bitcoin:

1. Money

2. Entropy

3. Energy

4. Power

5. Empire

Why is it FriDay Night and not Frinight?

Monnight

Tuesnight

Wednesnight

Thursnight

Frinight

Saturnight

Sunnight

New scheme!

The world just happens to these people as if it was exterior to their realities nostr:note1lgp5vpsn66pzyl8n5shlrhny3flngh8kkjzs9mapvsunkrkas75qhv4guc

It’s super strange listening to normies chat about the news… like the surface level event they see shows a complete lack of understanding of power, money, or politics.

Not sure what you need but here’s an diagram image, maybe it will help. Forgot the ‘i’ in noting ‘i < ‘ on the function. It’s technically identical logic for while just different syntax and implementation.

Super tempted to make this my profile pic

I understand and generally agree though I’m less prescriptivist about how language is used - the point is valid. TO your point, those would both fall under natural law because anarchy, as a concept, has competing definitions, both valid for different reasons. The philosophic idea is the anarchy we push for based on voluntary ideals; however the factual use of anarchy from a governmental perspective (libertine,etc) as lacking state control, though I am not fond of this use for the word it is a valid definition and it would also be anti-entropic. Anarchy, by both definitions, is anti-entropic because entropy would have human’s capacity to socialize rules be the guiding force within a group/society due to entropy driving homogeneity (classic race to the bottom of statism). Both, from a statist perspective, become indistinguishable as chaos to the system due to noncompliance, active or passive.