Avatar
pinkyjay
b0dbac368a5ac474bc19ab11a0b3fd4260cf56b40c60944c4a331b8ad8ced926
Replying to Avatar calle

nostr:npub1l2vyh47mk2p0qlsku7hg0vn29faehy9hy34ygaclpn66ukqp3afqutajft's NIP-60 is gaining traction. There are at least six different Cashu wallets that have support for NIP-60

NIP-60 specifies how to store ecash on nostr relays. This allows you to use the same ecash balance with different wallets or on different devices. You log in with your nsec and your ecash balance pops up.

I thought wallet synchronization is going to be a major challenge for Cashu wallets but it seems nostr devs have already solved the issue.

Very impressive.

FUIYOH!

As record companies are no required for production and distribution, internet DJs may become the recentralization point for curation/advertising instead because the sheer volume of music that will be created and released going forward. Especially with the use of LLMs, the curators (likely human) will become the trusted entities.

Home is behind

The world ahead

And there are many paths to tread

Through shadow

To the edge of night

Until the stars are all alight

Mist and shadow

Cloud and shade

All shall fade

All shall...fade

Honestly, I don't think you are wrong about the STRs being a bit much everywhere... but to not do it specifically here would str up more resentment for the missed opportunity

All your life you've been asleep. Make straight the way for the KING! HE is here to awaken the earth, but some will not want to waken. They’re in love with the dark. I wonder which one you'll be.

woah, TIL! Had never heard of them - jamming now. šŸ™ Thanks for the recommendation!

If they can choose a different client, is it really censorship or could it be curation? Can you say for certain that it would 100% be censorship? Is curation censorship? Should client made for kids allow porn or would curation be the key there? Would that be censorship?

Tough questions. I don't think it is good practice for the client creator to add a shit emoji (funny but not good practice); but I have a hard time seeing that as actual censorship when you can switch clients or even create your own.

I didn't mention users, stop assuming clients must cater to users - it's a dev curating the experience. You don't like it - leave, that's not censorship. The information is accessible elsewhere in the pure form you seek and is directly accessible should you care to run your own relay. That client has a red flag for you but that doesn't give you a bit of authority to dictate to devs how they MUST present information they receive from the network.

You don't like that the library may have added checkout slots to the books because it alters the effective published artifact. Go to a different library if it bothers you so much.

That would be crazy - I'm working on a plugin and realized I don't want to include an npub's followers and just include npubs that the profile follows when traversing profiles. The can of worms that would open should that be called censorship.

Moreover, I imagine that would cripple nostr's scalability.

I like steel men so here's mine: both arguments have merit since censor is ambiguous with at least two meanings:

1 - to remove/edit access to information

2 - to suppress intended information propagation which could come in the form pejorative framing without removal

However, when information is like water and someone wants filtered water because there are certain things they wish to prevent, it seems more like an expression of personal curation than censorious.

If one thinks curation is censorship, then Nostr will not be very fun as it scales. By that metric, not using all information would effectively be censorship and that's not reasonable.