Avatar
Auxmos
b15d7f1c18a80ed7ec245c06199ca8c5011d7cc244b9bff7072a70b70730828a
Here to maintain remembrance. As our lives become increasingly digitized, the integrity of our previous selves (digital history) is of utmost importance. I'm prone to forget and I won’t be lied to, so I’m here.

It isn’t obvious why the devil flees if you (just) resist him.

Submit yourselves, then, to God. Resist the devil, and he will flee from you.

James 4:7

“Then the devil left him, and angels came and attended him.”

Matthew 4:11

Is the revelation here that the Devil is lazy?

#asknostr

I’m taking it class by class at this point. If I wake up and my body feels good then I train. If not then I don’t.

I love the sport but I’ve been disappointed with the amount of injuries I’ve sustained in a short amount of time.

The best antidote for me has been to be thankful for each class I get the opportunity to go to even if it’s just one class.

I really enjoyed responding--and was sharpened by a closer look at that one particular verse (Eph. 4:6) than I think I'd done before. So: thank you, too.

I think the best answer is that the glory of a sunrise (or sunset) is magnified when we realize that it "speaks." It is a gift for us, and is wonderful in itself, and yet it speaks of an even greater glory. I think of Psalm 19. God is not the created light, or the created heat, but when we see the light and feel the heat it is as from his direct hand, and gives something true about him even if only by way of analogy. We can be thankful for both the gift, and the giver. I think in those situations, God is not necessarily "more present" -- he is always present everywhere -- but we are given a greater sense of his presence, like a veil is lifted a bit more. E.g., the armies of heaven were with Elisha all along, but he was granted to see/experience it for a moment (2 Kings 6).

So, I'm not sure I would use the word 'reflection,' though I think I see what you're getting at. I think I'd prefer the word 'messenger.' There is volition involved in God's creating the heavens and earth _in order to_ show his glory. Created beauty is a servant-messenger to the Creator, and is dependent on him. It is not (to expressly push back on pantheistic ideas) merely an emanation from his essence, nor part of his being, that 'just is.' He reveals what he wills about himself, when and where and how he, in his wisdom, so chooses. "The secret things belong to the Lord, but what he has revealed belongs to us, and to our children, forever." (Deut. 29:29).

If I'm away for a while, and my wife sends me a letter--I see her handwriting, I read her 'heart' and 'mind' (or whatever of it she has chosen to open to me in this moment), maybe there's even a faint whiff of her perfume--I do not have _her_ but I have clear evidence of her: I have many signs that 'point' to her, even though she is not physically present. (Even if she were, could I 'see' her love without her expressions of it--unless she speaks it, reveals it?) I think there's some analogy in that (though it does break down a bit because she, unlike God, is not omnipresent)...

But all that said: I certainly agree that in a majestic sunrise or sunset my mind is more fixed on the God who created that, for us, as a gift, and especially as a gift that gives some 'whiff' or 'hint' of his greater glory--into whose presence we (though enemies) are welcomed, by grace along, through faith alone, in Christ alone.

"...in your presence is fullness of joy; at your right hand are pleasures forever more." (Ps. 16:11).

Hope that gets at your question somewhat. (I am not gifted with concise-ness, sorry so long.)

The analogy to these things we “see” ultimately being messages is helpful.

To reference a note you posted a couple days ago:

note1tfdzwwrgd8jyddnuvzy96nqsj3uqdepnhae9klrnedkfrp57qqqssd66xk

Underneath it all, the fact that He is speaking is potentially the most important thing.

The idea that we have to realize He is speaking reminds me of Job 33:14:

For God does speak—now one way, now another—

though no one perceives it.

I appreciate you taking the time to write this out. It took me a while to review everything, but it proved to be extremely insightful.

With all that said, how do you think about the experience of His presence/nearness in something like a beautiful sunrise?

How does Romans 1:20 weave its way into this conversation:

“For since the creation of the world God’s invisible qualities—his eternal power and divine nature—have been clearly seen, being understood from what has been made, so that people are without excuse.”

Are we to understand the seeing of His invisible qualities as a “reflection” in the physical world around us or something else?

I don’t know of any multi sig setup that advocates for storing the backup for all signing devices.

They usually call for maintaining one or maybe two depending on the size of the key set.

Very cool. Have you ever the teaching that, in [Heb. 6:19-20](https://esv.org/Heb+6:19-20), the word behind 'forerunner' meant an anchor that was taken in to a safe harbor ahead of time--all they had to do was 'pull themselves in'? It's a fantastic image, and certainly fits the context:

> We have this as a sure and steadfast anchor of the soul, a hope that enters into the inner place behind the curtain, where Jesus has gone as a forerunner on our behalf, having become a high priest forever after the order of Melchizedek.

Another one taken from the seafaring life is 'apostle' -- it was used almost exclusively prior to Scripture to denote a ship that was "sent out" carrying an important message (or cargo) -- IIRC. As a mariner, you must get so much more out of some of the analgies, metaphors, and even word choices in Scripture than the 'landlubbers'. I think the same thing must be true about fishermen.

To your last point, I'd only suggest the important difference between saying that God is _in_ all things and saying that God _is_ all things. The former thing we can say (Aquinas said, "God is innermost to all things") and you could look up the doctrine of divine _immanence_ for more on that (in case you're not already familiar); but the latter thing tends to rule out God's _transcendence_ and makes his essence _identical_ with his creation. Yes, God can and does indwell his people, but not by blending or mixing the finite with the infinite, or by overwriting our personhood with his...hope that makes sense. We receive "his Spirit" in our "jars of clay."

Backing up, I love the analogies with navigation as well. I often begin my classes reminding people that we should start by getting 'oriented' -- which literally means to find East -- so that we can then situate ourselves properly in relation to that fixed point, and find our way.

Appreciate the interaction. 🤙🏻

I would like to hear more of your take on Ephesians 4:6.

You say “God can and does indwell his people, but not by blending or mixing the finite with the infinite…”

Is that not exactly what happened when Jesus took on flesh? Isn’t His life a “template” pointing to the beginning of all things?

[We receive "his Spirit" in our "jars of clay."]

Wouldn’t His bodily resurrection suggest that the emphasis shouldn’t be to conceptualize our bodies as “jars of clay”, but rather new (presumably eternal) “wine skins” (referencing Lk. 5:38).

If so, might that be a template for the whole (physical) world? 🌍

Very cool. Have you ever the teaching that, in [Heb. 6:19-20](https://esv.org/Heb+6:19-20), the word behind 'forerunner' meant an anchor that was taken in to a safe harbor ahead of time--all they had to do was 'pull themselves in'? It's a fantastic image, and certainly fits the context:

> We have this as a sure and steadfast anchor of the soul, a hope that enters into the inner place behind the curtain, where Jesus has gone as a forerunner on our behalf, having become a high priest forever after the order of Melchizedek.

Another one taken from the seafaring life is 'apostle' -- it was used almost exclusively prior to Scripture to denote a ship that was "sent out" carrying an important message (or cargo) -- IIRC. As a mariner, you must get so much more out of some of the analgies, metaphors, and even word choices in Scripture than the 'landlubbers'. I think the same thing must be true about fishermen.

To your last point, I'd only suggest the important difference between saying that God is _in_ all things and saying that God _is_ all things. The former thing we can say (Aquinas said, "God is innermost to all things") and you could look up the doctrine of divine _immanence_ for more on that (in case you're not already familiar); but the latter thing tends to rule out God's _transcendence_ and makes his essence _identical_ with his creation. Yes, God can and does indwell his people, but not by blending or mixing the finite with the infinite, or by overwriting our personhood with his...hope that makes sense. We receive "his Spirit" in our "jars of clay."

Backing up, I love the analogies with navigation as well. I often begin my classes reminding people that we should start by getting 'oriented' -- which literally means to find East -- so that we can then situate ourselves properly in relation to that fixed point, and find our way.

Appreciate the interaction. 🤙🏻

I had no idea about the origin of forerunner and apostle! That was rich. Thank you for sharing 🤝

Very cool. Have you ever the teaching that, in [Heb. 6:19-20](https://esv.org/Heb+6:19-20), the word behind 'forerunner' meant an anchor that was taken in to a safe harbor ahead of time--all they had to do was 'pull themselves in'? It's a fantastic image, and certainly fits the context:

> We have this as a sure and steadfast anchor of the soul, a hope that enters into the inner place behind the curtain, where Jesus has gone as a forerunner on our behalf, having become a high priest forever after the order of Melchizedek.

Another one taken from the seafaring life is 'apostle' -- it was used almost exclusively prior to Scripture to denote a ship that was "sent out" carrying an important message (or cargo) -- IIRC. As a mariner, you must get so much more out of some of the analgies, metaphors, and even word choices in Scripture than the 'landlubbers'. I think the same thing must be true about fishermen.

To your last point, I'd only suggest the important difference between saying that God is _in_ all things and saying that God _is_ all things. The former thing we can say (Aquinas said, "God is innermost to all things") and you could look up the doctrine of divine _immanence_ for more on that (in case you're not already familiar); but the latter thing tends to rule out God's _transcendence_ and makes his essence _identical_ with his creation. Yes, God can and does indwell his people, but not by blending or mixing the finite with the infinite, or by overwriting our personhood with his...hope that makes sense. We receive "his Spirit" in our "jars of clay."

Backing up, I love the analogies with navigation as well. I often begin my classes reminding people that we should start by getting 'oriented' -- which literally means to find East -- so that we can then situate ourselves properly in relation to that fixed point, and find our way.

Appreciate the interaction. 🤙🏻

🤯

I see.

I’m a Mariner by trade, so I appreciate the seamanship and celestial references.

I’m actually brushing up on my celestial navigation as we speak as I’m preparing for a license upgrade.

The podcast I shared makes a case for orienting yourself externally (not internally).

The parallel to the marine world would be a terrestrial fix, where you obtain your current location based off of fixed landmarks around you.

The idea that comes to mind now is that if you don’t look within but can’t see Him, due to metaphorical “fog” or “distance”, then the next best thing would be to fix your immediate position based on the physical world around you and chart a course in His direction.

It’s not obvious to be those aren’t the same thing, as He’s the one who is in all and through all. 🌍

🌊 🌊🌊🌊🌊🚢🌊🌊🌊🌊

Wow!!! Where is that????