🔊 GM🫂

Estoy en fase de Crisálida, transformando mi manera de vivir y creo que al Sistema le va a doler

1. Ya no tengo coche ni vivienda en propiedad [no me pueden expropiar]

2. No tengo un domicilio conocido fijo

3. Me voy de la ciudad al campo

4. Voy a buscar la autosuficiencia energética

5. Voy a tener mi huerto

6. Cada vez me voy a mover más por el mundo

7. Voy a intentar tener más de un pasaporte

8. Privacidad desde el diseño

9. Y más....

10. Permacultura

😄ehhh Usan google los que todavia estan interactuando con normies en el mundo real, compartiendo calendarios ,herramientas de software y recibendo emails de varias suscripciones y servicios .

No somos todos ninja-hackers viviendo en la sombra 😅

Todos tenemos el filtro antispam en google activado por defecto, filtra todos los spam?

No!

Pero la bandeja de entrada esta bastante limpia. (Alguien lo desactivo?)

Pasa Igual con los grafitis runas y gatos.

No va a filtrar todo, pero va a filtrar un buen porcentaje.

Esto es como la ventana de overton, ayer los gatos, antes de ayer las runas, hoy sacamos el filtro y manana tenemos reels de tik tok en la blockchain

Que preferimos un codigo limpio en bitcoin o un sdd sin datos no monerarios?

En que quedo lo de mi nodo mis reglas si no lo podemos configurar?

Bitcoin Core vs. Bitcoin Knots: The Great Bitcoin Spam Fight

The Bitcoin community is engaged in an interesting debate: Bitcoin Core vs. Bitcoin Knots. What are they? Why are they fighting?

Here, I explain clearly and simply, without missing any details, with neutrality and a touch of the "spam" controversy.

What is Bitcoin Core?

It's the main software used by approximately 90% of nodes (computers that keep Bitcoin running).

It's stable and developed by many programmers, but some say it doesn't react quickly to problems like network spam.

What is Bitcoin Knots?

An alternative version of Core, created in 2011 by Luke Dashjr.

It has everything Core has, but adds filters to block "annoying" transactions like NFTs or images on the blockchain.

It is used by approximately 633 nodes and relies on a single developer.

Why the conflict?

Everything exploded in 2023, when transactions like NFTs and "ordinals" (data like images on the blockchain) saturated the network, driving up costs.

Knots filters them to ease the network's burden; Core allows them if they pay fees, dividing the community.

What is "spam" in Bitcoin?

Think of the blockchain as a highway: transactions are like cars. Some (NFTs, JPGs) take up a lot of space, causing "traffic."

- Knots: Blocks them to clear the way.

- Core: Lets them through if they pay a "toll."

But who decides what is "spam"?

As the community says: "Spam is in the eyes of the recipient."

- Some see NFTs as spam, like a fake lottery email. Even if they pay, they don't want them on their nodes.

- Others say: "If they pay and the protocol allows it, it's not spam."

Think about it: someone sending mass emails about fake lotteries pays for the server and plays by the rules of the internet.

But you don't want those emails in your inbox. Likewise, some people don't want JPGs on their Bitcoin nodes, even if they're "valid" transactions.

Is it fair to filter them?

The debate began in 2023, when a bug ("Inscriptions", CVE-2023-50428) allowed data like NFTs to be inserted into the blockchain, overwhelming it.

Knots quickly fixed this in its 25.1 release, while Core was slower, leading some to view Knots as the solution to "spam."

Here are the sides in this debate:

- Team Core: They believe that any transaction that pays is valid. Filtering is like "censorship" and goes against the freedom of Bitcoin. They prefer stability and regulated fees.

- Team Knots: They want to protect the network from saturation, claiming that filters don't break the rules.

- Luke Dashjr (Knots): He says NFTs and ordinals are "spam" that clogs the network and increases costs. His filters help small nodes, but some criticize him for only maintaining Knots.

- Peter Todd: He sees "spam" as a problem, but says paid transactions are valid. He looks for open technical solutions.

Other technical voices

- achow101 (Core): In 2017, he said to use Core unless you need Knots' features, viewing Knots as an "extra."

- Developers like Gloria Zhao have shut down filter ideas in Core, frustrating those who want quick changes.

After asking a few people in the community, we came to different conclusions on both sides:

- Pro-Core: They value stability and fear that Knots, with only one developer, is risky. They say filtering is making decisions for others.

- Pro-Knots: They want anti-spam tools and criticize Core for being slow. They see Knots as an innovation.

The Filter Dilemma

Even if you filter JPGs on your node with Knots, if a miner includes them in a block, your node must accept it. It's like blocking a lottery email, but having to save it if it's already reached the server.

This makes the debate complex: do you filter or accept everything?

Technical explanation (easy)

The mempool is a waiting room for transactions.

Knots lets you choose what comes in (with filters like datacarrier=0), while Core accepts almost anything.

If many nodes used Knots, spam would be more expensive, but it wouldn't disappear.

Core is committed to stability and freedom; Knots is committed to control and efficiency. Spam divides because everyone has a different view of what's "annoying."

The community will decide whether Bitcoin should be "cleaner" or more "open."

Which side are you on?

Hay dos maneras de sacar a un mal gobernante, una es por la razón otra es por la fuerza. La primera es para los hombres, la segunda para las bestias. La diferencia es que la opción segunda jamás ha fallado

Maquiavelo

#grownostr #freedom #quotes #hola #hispano

Should I completely switch to English and keep my Spanish on Twitter?

love to hear that!

Con Bitcoin, puedes mantenerte operativo incluso en un apagón total:

-Alimentación de dispositivos con placas solares y baterías.

- Conexión mediante Starlink, sin depender de infraestructuras terrestres.

Así sigues enviando y recibiendo valor.

❓Si ocurriera un apagón masivo en tu país, se cortara el internet durante unas horas, no tuvieras efectivo, los cajeros no funcionan ni las aplicaciones de banco tampoco, ¿cómo vas a transferir valor?

#blackoutEurope #blackouts #blackout2025 #hispano #hola #cuba #bitcoin #cubabitcoin #cashu

Everybody knows the British went after the spices, but it was the Portuguese that significantly changed the food of the world.

Brazil didn't have coffee before the Portuguese brought it from Africa.

Japan didn't have tempura, or any deep fried dish, and a bread culture before the Portuguese.

Indian food wasnt spicy until the Portuguese brought chilli peppers, saffron, cinnamon, tomatos and potatoes from the Americas. Vindaloo comes from a portuguese technique of maninating pork in Vinho and Alho (garlic).

While the French were dominating cooking techniques for themselves, the Portuguese were spreading ingredients worldwide to anyone willing to trade with them.

The internet

Various articles

I assume it's accurate

But I'm not sure, I wasn't there.

Timeline of Events — April 28, 2025

| Time (WEST) | Time (EDT) | Event |

|-------------|------------|-------|

| 8:00 a.m. WEST | 3:00 a.m. EDT | Meteorological stations detect rapid temperature inversions over the Iberian Peninsula. Humidity climbs sharply. |

| 9:15 a.m. WEST | 4:15 a.m. EDT | Localized atmospheric ionization begins near high-voltage lines (detected as weak radio emissions). |

| 10:20 a.m. WEST | 5:20 a.m. EDT | Corona discharges intensify; field sensors register irregular electric field gradients along transmission corridors. |

| 11:05 a.m. WEST | 6:05 a.m. EDT | First instances of mechanical resonance (IAV) are recorded — ultra-low frequency oscillations (0.2–0.5 Hz) in transmission lines. |

| 11:33 a.m. WEST | 6:33 a.m. EDT | Grid desynchronization event occurs; protective systems isolate regions to prevent continental blackout. Outages spread across Spain, Portugal, and southern France. |

| 12:00 p.m. WEST onward | 7:00 a.m. EDT onward | Emergency operations restore some power, but full stabilization takes several hours. |

Note:

- WEST (Western European Summer Time) = UTC+1

- EDT (Eastern Daylight Time) = UTC-4

There’s a 5-hour time difference between Spain/Portugal and New York on this date.