Basically, excuse the flawed spontaneity, engage with real things, and see where they direct your attention.
Do you know anything honest in your life?
You can always change.
Do shorter days
One day Wordle will rule the network. If we only had stopped playing, if only we prevented it from taking over haha
Oh, you still finished with a try to spare, nothing to scoff at, ignore my aloofness fresh off my three try streak, my reckoning surely awaits
#wordle 1,407 3/6*
🟩⬛🟩⬛⬛
🟩🟨🟩🟨⬛
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
made
#wordle 1,406 3/6*
⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛
⬛⬛🟨🟨⬛
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
safe
Ozone has no literary meaning, it just names a substance. I see Wordle as a language, or, word game, no trivia game.
Fair, appreciate the conciliatory attitude. Let me check back in June.
#wordle 1,405 5/6*
⬛⬛🟨⬛⬛
🟩⬛⬛⬛🟩
🟩⬛🟨⬛🟩
🟩🟨⬛⬛🟩
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
low continuous
Sorry I forgot to follow up earlier, I just expect a more literary dictionary, that solution has barely any use or meaning in the language.
Can elliptic curve provide no way to calculate keys with a human readable segment? I imagined that as the mining process, admittedly quite loosely, expecting you or others here to already have explored the topic in depth.
I feel very convinced of the key pair, specifically BECH32 format. Also intent on avoiding a separate resolving step, the pubkey should provide both the full address and the human readable element. I could imagine an autocomplete step for the non human readable part based on some network traffic analytics, eg. completing to the most visited key containing the entered human readable part.
Again, I only loosely thought about this so far.
Regarding Pubky, as I am sure you are aware, there are tradeoffs with everything. John wrote a piece about that, not sure if you've seen it, so I will share it here if you think there is any merit to reading it - https://medium.com/pubky/corporate-vs-community-led-open-source-development-491a03da58e6
I finally had the chance to look this over. I admit that I only skimmed over it, since my skepticism has no connection to the suggested corporate or distributed issue. Furthermore, my only personal attempt at public collaborative development has subjectively turned out entirely unfeasible and ineffective. In regard to the supposed dichotic alternative of corporate development, the current definition of a corporation, closely tied to the nation state model, looks entirely inadequate for the reality of global real time data networks. I might lack enough education to evaluate and articulate this more clearly, I feel entitled to at least describing conclusions from year long personal experiences.
In conclusion, I do think that both ideas and implementations can and should speak for themselves, and current Nostr developments give me a definite sense of both flexible and durable properties, and a ground up construction. Pubky lacks that impression, though it did have comparably less time to grow.
As said in another comment today, I personally just want decent basic functionality. I constantly see things do too much, and create far too much noise, including that elaborate treatise about a pretty tangential, and anachronistic issue.
I would really like to see new collaborative structures that properly address attention economics in context of the internet, while avoiding the crutch of violence monopoly enforcement.
So, where lies the difficulty in supposed key mining?
Does it take any significant processing effort to generate name keys?
I just feel relieved I could explain myself. The time might indeed have gotten away with this one, this kicked the proverbial can down the road perhaps more than a 2MB block size increase at the time.
In fairness, I actually like the ID, source, post text juxtaposition idea, the ideas have valid aspects, then a blind, delirious person went and executed the layout though.
This, this looks like a maze in topdown view. Minotaur tried to add a little ironic pathos.
The geometric complexity might also induce epileptic seizures, and disorient the elderly until they wander into highway traffic.
These jokes aim to lighten the mood and try to add another layer to the conversation unaffected by evident disagreement on how to draft a basic menu layout.

It does firsthand compete with Damus for me, I get your perspective, for myself I see things much less sophisticated. I want a public discourse network with no central authority and an approachable, simple, distraction free client.
Sorry,
It probably reads a bit confusingly outside the thought context I wrote it in. Sorry again.
Your app competes with Damus.
I want your full Swift code and less conventional interface, that interface could also serve as a template for a Minotaur maze.
Recently I encountered the custom share sheet for the first time, I shied away in disbelief. It has all options since the beginning of time, and then some.
