Avatar
Lostdog
b51e30b06ec34d57234510627fcfd34ad6a44003194adafdc0096f6d53b047eb
Nature conservation, photography, bitcoin, nostr, liberty

On the road again...

#gravel #cycling

Paying people who are long ETH seems like a risky and very roundabout way to break even Tuur! Have you considered just hodling instead? 😜

Makes sense to a certain extent, for obviously illegal content

Lol 🤣 , if he's bombarded like this by the Tates' incel army after some basic questions, imagine how bad it'll get after an "investigation" of World Liberty Financial (Trump's shitcoin)

Reminds me of that time that I deleted an iSCSI disk (disk no. 5) and then disks no. 6, 7 and 8 for some reason were renamed automatically, on-the-fly, to no. 5, 6 and 7. Fileserver started writing to the mailserver disk, mailserver started writing to a webserver disk, etc. Shit was beyond repair and I spent much of the weekend doing disaster recovery

This was also the weekend I was taught the disadvantage of RAID 5 the hard way (it's slowwww 🐌), RAID 10 ftw

In a new paper, the European Central Bank is essentially telling you to HFSP if you don't hold #Bitcoin 🤣

https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4985877

Replying to Avatar rabble

GN

Office with a view! 🖼️

I think you're too easily manipulated into fearing "they" and bikes

But before going into all those tangents, let's go back to your original statement that you still have not substantiated. Global mean temperature wasn't warmer after the Renaissance than it is today

Many deniers paid for by big oil you mean? No doubt there are.

But I have no clue why you feel you need to bring Bill Gates into the conversation

Assange was charged by the Trump administration and the CIA made plans to assassinate Assange and his family under Trump's watch. Pompeo was Trump's pick...

The reason Trump can't free Assange is because Biden admin already did...

Really, a paper by a GP that brings Frederick Seitz forward as an expert on climate?

Seitz was paid by big tobacco to deny smoking causes lung cancer before moving on to being paid by big oil to deny climate change

That page literally says

"Data obtained from Internet sources".

That's not a reference, it's not even an opinion I can check.

Why do you think those graphs stop at 1900 AD? What would they look like of you would include the last 50 years of warming?

This is just online quackery. Fine if you're just trolling, but scientifically worthless

Sure, just show me your data source that says global average temperature was hotter after the Renaissance than today.

The main drivers of the "little ice age" were decreased solar activity and increased volcanic activity (aerosols). These factors cannot explain the current warming we observe.

The stratospheric cooling that is observed, confirms that CO2 is the primary driver of change in the last decades. The physics behind this are well established and 170 years old by now (Tyndall, Foote). The first accurate predictions of radiative forcing are 120 years old (Arrhenius). Feel free to disprove it but I'd suggest you educate yourself first

Alternatively, one could choose to disagree with policies and be against centralization of power without denying basic physics. Ignorance is not a virtue