Avatar
Lostdog
b51e30b06ec34d57234510627fcfd34ad6a44003194adafdc0096f6d53b047eb
Nature conservation, photography, bitcoin, nostr, liberty

NS should really clean their windows more often 😂

And GM ☕

Don't think that would be particularly helpful. "Warming" is meaningless to people because even though it's the main driver of change, it just refers to the global average of one particular aspect of climate

It's 2025 mate, be careful what you ask for... 😜

We shouldn't forget Marc Andreessen is usually the one punching people in the face

He made billions in "yield" off of numerous pumps and dumps in the last 2 scamcoin cycles

Must be convenient for him that all charges have been dropped now

The cherry on the cake this cycle really is a shitcoin president 🍰

Take an early morning walk to start the day fresh 😁☀️. Also, GM

1. Scammer charged for market manipulation

2. Scammer buys 30 million of Trump's World Liberty Financial scam

3. Charges dropped

This was not some vague case. This is Justin Sun who scammed millions of people for billions of dollars for at least 8 years now. Is this really how we want the world to work? Who's next, Richard Heart?

https://popular.info/p/breaking-sec-halts-fraud-prosecution

OPEN-SOURCE EVERYTHING

I didn't see this one coming though: EA open-sourced the Command & Conquer series source code today:

😁

https://github.com/electronicarts/CnC_Red_Alert

Strawman argument. Paleo climate is certainly included in climate science and pretending that it isn't is dishonest or ignorant. It's the reason why we can differentiate between natural drivers of change and human drivers in the first place

Sure, Foote and Tyndall were influenced by "woke" politics in the 1850s, don't be ridiculous

The heat island argument, which essentially denied that real warming even occurred, was debunked decades ago. It e.g. doesn doesn't offer any explanation for sea surface temperature increases (which have been absurdly high the last few years)

Radiative imbalance on the other hand is measured directly, explains the vast majority of warming and even predicts the stratospheric cooling we observe (something "sKepTiCs" can't and typically avoid discussing)

You're the one bringing politicians and minions into this, not me.

Climate science is just physics. Radiative forcing (aka the "greenhouse effect") has been known since the 1850s (Foote, Tyndall) and the first accurate prediction of it's effect on global temperature (Arrhenius) is from 1906.

If you really think geology is the only factor at play you just make yourself look ignorant. It doesn't offer any explanation for the significant changes we observe today

Someone who put in the work to understand how the climate actually works and who's published verifiable research on the topic. Peter had Katherine Hayhoe and Andrew Dressler on for example

With "work" I don't mean reading a few blogs aligned to your own confirmation bias

The research is all out there, publicly available...

I'd have expected you had learned enough from the qualified climate scientists you had on on earlier shows to be able to call out more of her obvious bs... it's a bit sad to be quite honest