Apparently an ETF is DeMoCrAtIsInG #bitcoin because onchain or exchange transactions have single digit fees 🤡
Don't for a second believe these clowns are here for anything else other than your money.
Not your keys, not your coins.
https://twitter.com/saylor/status/1679857360011943938?s=46&t=v7iZ2YqPY4AFMTdnLfilqg
About damn time. nostr:note1q4yftth4aztjcawlc2whvxt83ra72uceqqmrpqa0e0eyr572qrpsmgdffp
Amazing documentary, congrats! nostr:note1nzqtyuh9rvx5qtjua9pzlvc996emgwwgk76lxmj6fxvychpsqg7s0ft44z
That sounds a bit hackish but at the same time is very inovative & cool 😂
But what's wrong with having the messages stay on one (or more) relays for a long period of time? That allows you to switch devices and preserve your historical messages, right?
What do the colors represent?
nostr:npub1k5a4y6yfarc8p62xq0uae8jf3aa25mm5eptc20ysyfp0766ypmjsswjkdv each copy of the repository counts, that’s how Git is decentralized
If the centralized service used for collaboration is no more, each copy still works and can be pushed to another server if they wish to continue collaborating
Who will get to push the code to another server? nostr:npub1xtscya34g58tk0z605fvr788k263gsu6cy9x0mhnm87echrgufzsevkk5s's main branch which contains 1 commit ahead of yesterday's last commit for everyone, or mine, which contains 2 other separate commits than his?
Without a centralized origin which purpose is to retain the source of truth for all collaborators and mitigate conflicts, you can't efficiently work in a multi team, distributed setup.
Which comes back to my initial point. Yes, it's a step in the right direction to not depend on 3rd party services that might go away tomorrow. BUT. That doesn't negate the need for a centralized master repository. Which makes the entire network still centralized. Distributed. But centralized.
The only difference is that now the central location is not Github anymore, but nostr:npub1xtscya34g58tk0z605fvr788k263gsu6cy9x0mhnm87echrgufzsevkk5s's repo. What happens if that goes down? Or something else happens?
I'm an Android developer for the past 11 years, I know how Git works 😂
But without a proper automated conflict resolution strategy, you still need a centralized origin to hold the source of truth, hence making the network distributed, not decentralized.
My point was that as long as you're using plain Git, you're still relying on a centralized server. Sure, if you're hosting it yourself, you take away the dependency on 3rd party services, but still, it's not 100% decentralized.
Yep, I've ran into that issue with not all of them connecting and indeed, a restart almost always helps. Probably some issue with Damus itself.
But I also did a cleanup of the relays that I previously had, as some of them were not even valid anymore. It's probably a good idea to do this sort of cleanup every now and then.
But if the code is still contained in a Git repository over at Github, this isn't really decentralized.
That is indeed a pretty big coincidence 😂 nostr:note14x69ar8m38nyg2xyew94ye4adm3wanedjdegg3yuk4aa4esw05ysd77t26
600k is a bit of a stretch, but sure 😅
Well, which relays are you using that seem to be having problems?
How to completely fuck up a platform 101. 
The next cycle is well on its way. nostr:note1220v9f00ldk29tm9kgaf3y0gytxzulrggcjvtjfg5zngtyyfdhuseu6lnt
Or, if you're interested in more actively watching the frontline, check out this YouTube channel for updates:
That's because for the past few months they've been preparing for the counteroffensive, which just recently started. We should know more in the upcoming weeks.
TBH I don't believe that's the best approach going forward. Having native UI specific to each platform provides much better user experience.
Have you considered taking the multiplatform architecture approach for the data & domain layers (with platform-specific UI layer) using something such as Kotlin Multiplatform? That way you have the best of both worlds.
I get the digital content part, but how the hell is the owner of the note "selling" it if it's publicly available? 😂
It's more of a donation instead of a buying type of transaction... Did you take the discussion into that direction with them?

