Avatar
jared
b726e71bce585201181ace89326ae428406cee071395f9bf12b62b62d0449b23
Cybersecurity. Identity. Powershell. Class of 2013. Degree in Bending from Bending State.
Replying to Avatar hh

I always argue that fiat isn't going away because it's simply the most powerful tool States have to achieve total domination over their subjects, and that Bitcoin will, at most, become a reserve and store of wealth asset/commodity. Just like there are many other asset classes.

As to the visions of hyperbitcoinization and a big upset and collapse of the system, I simply don't think they're going to happen. The incumbents will adapt and will capture as much of Bitcoin as they can, as we've already seen with billionaires like Michael Saylor. Others will follow, and in the last stage even central banks will hold a piece. The most recalcitrant and close-minded among the elites who refuse to hop on the Bitcoin wagon will simply miss out and be relegated -- in that asset. There is always some attrition at the top.

The key difference though, is that Bitcoin is probably the first asset class in recent history that hasn't been captured from inception by the incumbent status-quo beneficiaries. It's truly something phenomenal, in that it gives a bunch of nobodies the opportunity to position themselves as holders of a significant portion of this asset, ahead of the incumbents.

The weakest among us will sell to Michael Saylor and Blackrock, or will allow their BTC to be seized by their government. A second portion of us will fail to turn their Bitcoin wealth into real world wealth and, sooner or later, their stack will succumb to attrition, either because they fail to understand that Bitcoin, as a non-yield bearing asset doesn't replace itself when you spend it, or because they fail to use it wisely as collateral and eventually have to liquidate their holdings.

The remainder who learn how to use Bitcoin correctly and wisely, will eventually join the ranks of the world's elite and become the new incumbents themselves.

Yes, my outlook is quite cynical. This is my bleakest vision of what's to come. Kind of the worst case scenario for which I prepare, just in case.

Aren’t you predicting the present here rather than the future?

The one thing I can predict for certain is that the future will be different from the present.

Feel sorry for these human beings that cannot find a grain of truth to which they can cling.

People are people so why should it be that you and I should get along so awfully.

-Depeche Mode

Replying to Avatar Oren ☂️

Here is another demo of my NIP implementation.

Now using ephemeral events, NIP-44 encryption and NIP-59 gift wraps:

https://github.com/nostr-protocol/nips/pull/1276

I suggest we’ll call it NIP-80 after the default http port.

Imagine future browsers ( #browstr ) allowing you to enter http://.nostr/… and it would simply send the http request and receive the response via nostr events! Just like .onion sites but without the slowness of TOR.

It can also be useful for #iot devices that can serve a simple configuration-website and allow “browsing” them from anywhere in the world. I think TOR is too complicated to run on such devices.

nostr:npub1gcxzte5zlkncx26j68ez60fzkvtkm9e0vrwdcvsjakxf9mu9qewqlfnj5z WDYT? https://v.nostr.build/VAREX7f6XB8sTPQr.mp4

Great!

Can we get web sockets over nostr?

I want to do web sockets over nostr over web sockets and see if it rips a hole in the space-time continuum.

Is the list of people you follow also a list of people you trust?

Mine isn’t…

Ring 0 is me.

Ring 1 is people I trust enough to help me recover my life savings.

Ring 2 is friends and family that didn’t make it to ring 1.

Ring 3 is people whose opinions/memes/shitposts I’m interested in reading.

Right now, none of my ring 1 people are on nostr.

It’s a fractional reserve system so, yeah, they’re insolvent by definition

Republicans will do squat to help anyone but themselves just like Democrats.

Voting won’t change anything or it would have already.

Better to not vote so your consent to be governed is not implied.

So if I say everything you’re saying hurts me are you going to stop talking forever?

Of course not, because neither words nor silence are actually violence.

Chants of “Silence is violence” is making a case that it’s ok to use force against people who speak their opinion.

The logical conclusion of this flawed thinking is that we can arrest, jail, or worse anyone with an unpopular opinion.

And unpopular opinions are, by definition, political if the state wants to use force to stop you from saying it.

Lots of fun for the whole family. Here’s our city

How many of these transactions are possible with self-managed / uncensorable channels?

Lando was clearly upset, and rightly so since Verstappen was penalized 10 seconds for running Lando off and forcing the incident, but Lando should have stayed in his car and gotten some points like Max did, I think.

Replying to Avatar Cyph3rp9nk

Yes. The value of a house doesn’t change much.

You never make money from appreciation of your house but rather you just avoid the loss of purchasing power of fiat by having some wealth in real estate.