Thanks for all your context. Helps me understand your reasoning. And I am sure you always find a way that works for you. You seem to be very practicle and adapt easy. All great qualities.
But maby in all the heroic ststements of ancient nutrition. I think through most times Human were as hunter gathere just a surviving species without much wealth through most time. And back then a 40 year old person was amongs the oldest. Today we have many countries with intermideat mortality above 80 years. So I assume we live healthier today then back then. A lot for sure is the better savety we have from hunger and al the hospitals that make sure a flue does not kill most people as before moderne medicine. We found ways to treat many illnesses or even bring them to extinct (or close to it). So probably quiet a bunch of general improvements are actually good. Even when I agree that health conditions are often very individual and many practicing docter do not have the time to go very deep into the problem of every pacient. So probably there is big room for improvement. Maby AI programs can help there a lot in analyzing.
#schweiz #deutsch #lernen
https://www.srf.ch/play/tv/redirect/detail/3f225d5c-76bb-4e6c-a6e8-4b2f9cb1a238
Ich finde dieses Konzept zu lernen sehr fortschrittlich. Ich habe selber nicht so gelernt. Aber wenn Lernen spass macht und man lernt seine Stärken und schwächen zu kennen, glaube ich ist das die beste vorbereitung fürs Leben. Ganz egal für welche Herausforderung.
UK Gov't, Media & Courts: Coordinated Strategy to Tar & Silence Critics & Protestors as "Far Right"?
w/ Nina Power
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8xWepxNy-Ec
#uk #brits
I am not from the UK. I only got the information of the lists of targets that have been shared in right extremist circles to burn down and kill immigrants.
What do the people protest for or against, that have decent reasoning? So not promoting or acting criminal but anyways being silenced. Any footage or personal information on that?
Yes I think an other approach is that taxes can be paid in Bitcoin too. Then it is up to the state to keep it in a wallet or exchange it to the local fiat. This would make life much easier for businesses.
Neighter the existance nor the inexistance can be proofen. If there is something above all natural rules is completely up to our faith.
Based on what? Sorry for the maby stupid question. What makes spammers less powerfull on noster?
This way ia kind of the standard to build Holz100 (Wood100) houses. That are Houses which are built with nothing but wood, plus the cables for electricity and tubes for water. An austrian created the standard.
I hope you know, that loosing all trust is very dangorus. In a sense, that all knowledge builds on trust. First on trust in our memory, then in our senses. After that trusting others around. And in the end one has no possibility to distrust everyone. So when you do not trust the best verified science and the mechanics of it, there is just no higher standard that can be superior.
How is it you trust Bitcoin? Probably you didn't review the code. To just distrust a conclusion, with the only reason that there could be false is nearly insane. How you then trust the theories you came up with?
I bet these sell very well now. Testet by most extreme circunstances😉
But can this story be true that these leggins survived without scratches?
Can I tell you one thing about science in general. It does actually not matter too much who finance studies or who executes them. It is important that they are peer reviewed. And can be executed the same way at any given time and place. And the results should come to the same or similar conclusion. This is how scince work. It is independent from religion belief or god.
Of course there are studies of poor quality. But those can be pointed out. Not for the autor. But by explaining the methological issues that exist with the given study.
This can for shure have some truth, that the gain in pultry might not be as good as all the pumping muscleinfluencers try to suggest. Maby also can have some negative health influence I guess.
W study or one person can not directly be considered represental. But I can imagine, that one can eat a lot of meat and have a healthy lifestyle. Thia is no counterargument against plantbased foods. And I would never say white bread, sugary drinks, cake and all junkfood can be considered healthy. Not say.
And over all health has more factors then just food. It is about physical activity, having a good circle of people around to have fun with and so on that have big influence on the health as well. Eating is just one big factor of the equation to health.
And for your curiosity. I am somewhere normal with a BMI around 22. But this does not give my arguments any real value. Arguments from lean people are not better nor worse in quality then the same arguments from a fat person.
The conversation seems to gain in quality it seems for me.
17 august 2024
Nicolás Maduro's regime deploys the military throughout Caracas to prevent the massive participation of opposition protesters.
https://video.nostr.build/df0a4085731e19cdd2506a5fce4987c25ab653d0db4c7c56e5c64b3ea176885c.mp4
#venezuela
Muy triste ver esos imagines. Toto los esfuerzas del militario solo para servir a un tyranno ilegitimado.
You refer to this one I assume? Since all other sheep seem to follow without critique. Similar to 1933 in ger...
What you mean with again? If something is prooven means it is right. It is as easy. All premises of a theory are proofen to be true -> conclusion is logically true.
One of the premises can not be proven to be true -> no proof of truth, so it could also not be true
One of the premis is proven to be wrong -> conclusion is wrong
This was only answer to your question. My initial question was only what is your opinion on what makes a winner in a argument. Offtopic of if you or me could win or loose an argument.
I think it does not matter if it is on page one or on page 20 of an internet search. Important is if a reasearch was peerreviewed, created with scientific intent to figure out a measurable and logical explainable causality/hypothesis and proof it with real world data.
I did not know until now that even in 2024 the US government found a way to even make surveillance more invasive then before:
