Avatar
Mark Camper
b7e453f6fdeb79cca1d86fbf0c4b20ebeead1de9f5067522638d03ce9ff08e8c
Bitcoin Pleb & Econ larper. Paying bills with Product & UX. Love for the tough mountain climbs and manual labor. Currently enrolled in a Blue collar bootcamp. CZ/EN

State is a 0.1% pass-through organization that you're not allowed to not fund.

Yes, that was probably it! Just no cherries back there.

I bet you can imagine how the soviet-old Czech pub version was like. 😅

Lol!

If you "remember", then you handled it better than 90% people who ever drank that 💪

But once I met a bartender in the US who was having a version of it on the menu. It was actually perfectly balanced, delicious, and still strong as fuck, but not necessarily knocking people off right away.

- champagne, some honey syrup, lemon juice, and some vodka or maybe bourbon with it. Don't remember, the bar shut down long time ago...

We gonna need @nostr:npub16secklpnqey3el04fy2drfftsz5k26zlwdsnz84wtul2luwj8fdsugjdxk to help us reimagine this good old polar bear drink. 🥂

Replying to Avatar Tim Bouma

I’ve been thinking about this a lot. An imperfect analogy, perhaps, but an ideal monetary system is like the gearing system of a bicycle. The most important factor is to develop a system that can adjust to variable conditions such as going uphill/downhill, headwinds/tailwinds using a finite input of power (leg muscles). A fixed single speed bike (like Bitcoin Layer 1) is the simplest, but it won’t get you very far on a 100km ride through the mountains. This is where the gearing helps.

So, Layer 1 (Bitcoin) is the pedal assembly that takes the power and turns it into torquing power. Layer 2 Lightning is the bicycle chain and freewheel assembly that enables the transmission of power to a useful place, namely the rear wheel. And finally ‘Layer 3’ Cashu (there is a debate whether it is a Layer, but we’ll set that aside), is the gearing cassette/chainring that allows for selective leverage to match the conditions demanded of the road before you.

If you’re an experienced cyclist, you know how much strategy goes into selecting the right gear combo, when to preserve/expend energy. For a particular ride, you know that comes from a finite source - your legs. If you want more power, you need to do additional training to increase the power available for your next ride.

As I said at the outset, this is an imperfect analogy, but IMHO is is better than the simple ‘scaling’ that the layers provide. Instead, in the spirit of the First Law of Thermodynamics, you are not creating any new energy (i.e., money) but rather adjusting the power (money) system to best suit road (economic) conditions ahead.

Keynesians would measure the economic output at the rate the legs are spinning. Sound economics is measured in the miles you ride.

Their favorite hack is to keep downshifting whenever not necessary, or loosening the chain.

Replying to Avatar PABLOF7z

what if... (and you probably know what I'm going to say...)

we publish these features on nostr.

Say for example I add "pin-note" support to nostr:npub1w0rthyjyp2f5gful0gm2500pwyxfrx93a85289xdz0sd6hyef33sh2cu4x

I publish a new event kind tagging my NIP-89 entry of Highlighter. Thus I signal that Highlighter supports that feature.

That way, say for example I later add "mute-list" support; I could just publish the event.

There is NO WAY someone, not even nostr:npub1zafcms4xya5ap9zr7xxr0jlrtrattwlesytn2s42030lzu0dwlzqpd26k5 , will be able to keep up with all the clients and all the features we are all constantly pushing.

But we can push it to the edges, me as a developer, it is basically no extra work to publish an event indicating the new feature when I cut a new version.

nostr:nevent1qqspv6sma6atmdax3apc009rv4u9xqsa7zs5ejgdh8jdw4umassx83cppemhxue69uhkummn9ekx7mp0qgsdv8emcke7k3qqaldwv956tstu40ejg663gdsaayuuujs6pknw7jsrf43u3

Could DVM replace super-elsat here?

Replying to Avatar pam

A couple of years back when I took on my first job, one of the first things I did was to buy my dad a new car. My dad has only driven old cars. I remember when we were kids, he had this old Morris Marina and on the way to church there was a thunderstorm, the wiper stopped working and the bonnet flew up covering the window. I have no idea how he managed to pull over and close the bonnet back, but that was probably the best car we had growing up. And so it was really nice to get him a brand new car. He was so happy.

After a few months, the new car had a small dent (it happens) so my dad sent it to a workshop for a paint job. Unfortunately at the workshop, a 3 tonne lorry smashed into the car.

Coincidentally the workshop claimed to represent the car manufacturer and the police were there recognizing the credibility of the workshop. They claimed to be able to replace all brand new parts as the car was under manufacturer's warranty. I agreed to the repair.

Unfortunately they half-cut the car and patch it with another junk car. It only cost them 10% of the insurance amount they filed for the repair.

It was fraud and an illegal move but they paid off the car legal inspection to claim it was safe. There are certain angles that you can half cut the car so that it won’t split open, but they did not abide by any engineering rules either.

I refused to take the car and filed a police report but they also paid off the cops. I filed 11 reports, and no actions were taken. There was a time I remembered the cops just laughed.

And all throughout this time I served the car loan for my dad’s car (and my car) so that my credit scores didn't get hammered. And I also had to pay off the numerous summons under my name and parking tickets the workshop caused me as they were using it.

I asked the bank to repossess the car but they could not enter private premises. I spoke to the car insurance and that’s when they told me they had many cases like this and it was a massive car scam.

Eventually I took the case to court. I won the case, and was awarded a very decent sum of money as reimbursement. My dad passed away before this so he never knew I won the case.

But I soon learned that winning a case and getting the money is two different things.

The workshop filed for bankruptcy, as they also defaulted payments to the banks.

There is a gov’t insolvency agency who is in charge of liquidation and after 4 years of me following up on the money, they sent a letter 2 weeks ago saying the workshop has no assets and they will not be pursuing liquidation.

I don’t know if they were paid off too but corruption is so common here, it won’t be surprising to me.

The workshop is humongous, with a lot of tractors and big machinery. Ironically, they are still in operation, just registered under a diff company name.

A lawyer friend of mine asked me to go down the path of engaging the courts to hire private liquidators instead.

It would be nice to have the money but the thought of another legal process is just overwhelming. I have not been able to decide.

Sometimes I want to stand for what I believe in, but sometimes I’m so beaten down I just want to give up and move on.

What a frustrating experience. The karma works for everyone. You did all great.

Is truly trustless even theoretically possible?

Even Bitcoin (L1) is just trust minimizing solution.

We'll see how it turns out, the markets will decide what are the acceptable tradeoffs.

Would you rather turn your utxos effectively to a dust (near dust)?

What's the alternative you would use if, let's say, a fee would be 1-10x of the stated transaction price?

Why is the RHR the only 'ended' recording on zap.stream that doesn't load?

@npub1v0lxxxxutpvrelsksy8cdhgfux9l6a42hsj2qzquu2zk7vc9qnkszrqj49

It is falling on its head big time. Watch out for newly manufactured division attempts in the society.