Avatar
Knightstr
b8c8499585f98609ff14a252b7b7cbe0651cbd91dc02563081308465d9a9a980
Begone centralization

Fax.

If you’re working out: coconut water

Nah, keep yours friend 🤙

I’m surprised MI6 isn’t offering him a deal he can’t refuse lol. Point this kid at some adversaries ya bozos

Gotta do more than post headlines with an emoji or two.

I’m not going to point fingers but a lot of these influencers coming from X to post about bitcoin are essentially human RSS feeds with an emoji keyboard

Refuse to hate your fellow man, and the state loses its power to use you for its own interests.

One nation, under god, indivisible.

Be indivisible. You can disagree, but do it with love and they’ll come along.

Replying to Avatar jimmysong

Bare Multisig Outputs

-----------------------

Blocks are getting filled with bare multisig outputs and it's an obvious troll from people that hate Bitcoin. Let me explain.

Multisig currently can be done in many ways, but before p2sh (BIP0013), the only way to do multisig was through putting the many pubkeys on-chain. As ECDSA doesn't really let you aggregate keys, outputs had to specify something like "3-of-5 of these pubkeys." The normal UTXOs have the following number of bytes:

p2pkh:25

p2sh:23

p2wpkh:22

p2wsh:34

p2tr:34

By contrast the n in the k-of-n bare multisig determines the number of bytes and it's 5 + 34 * n (my math might be off, but around there). So for 3-of-5, it's upwards of 170 bytes. But that's using compressed keys. For uncompressed keys, you it's 5 + 66 * n or 335 bytes+, and worse, you can put in illegitimate uncompressed keys (keys that are provably have no private key) to add data to the chain

Why does this matter? Because these bytes stay in the UTXO set, which is what Bitcoin software optimizes for because that's how you validate that a transaction is a not double spend and satisfies the conditions of the smart contract that locked it.

What's worse, if the pubkeys are unspendable (uncompressed keys that are not real points on the secp256k1 curve), then they'll *never* be pruned. So the UTXO set grows larger and requires more resources for your typical node runner.

Interestingly, this was how the whitepaper was embedded into the Bitcoin blockchain by putting pieces of the whitepaper pdf in 64 byte chunks through uncompressed pubkeys. Luke's Eligius pool was one of the first to ban such transactions because they were clearly bloating not just the blockchain, but the UTXO set.

That's what these trolls are doing. They're adding to the UTXO set that's not easily prunable, though now, I'm guessing some people will add pruning for UTXOs with multisig outputs that don't have any legitimate keys.

Game theory. People that don’t want to be disrupted trying to poke holes in bitcoin. Best team wins 🤷‍♂️

I agree with your sentiment in the problems with healthcare, but disagree with the view that the insurance companies are customers.

Medical facilities can’t bill patients insurance without having MD’s to provide the care. Healthcare facilities are merely infrastructure for licensed professionals to provide billable services within.

From the perspective of the business of healthcare, which are the places you actually go to receive the care, the customers are the doctors.

From a healthcare company perspective:

Doctors are the customers. Companies compete with each other for doctors who provide the volume to expand margins.

Patients are a commodity to be profited off of. This is why we have sick-care instead of healthcare. There’s no cash flows in cures.

The government and insurance entities engage in a racket to prevent true price discovery, allowing the pharmaceutical and medical device companies to price gouge the taxpayers indirectly through:

-Medicare subsidies and reimbursement, predatory insurance premiums, and regulatory capture of the FDA.

Crony Capitalism at its finest. The best way to disrupt this system is to exercise, and only eat whole foods. The less ingredients the better. The best foods have no nutrition label. Meat, fish, eggs, dairy, fruits, vegetables, nuts.

Yep. They’re just coding in appeal to authority. CNN, BBC, and the New York Times are flagged as “trusted” I’m sure

🤡🤡

This is the digital age. There is no objective truth in media. Just which side of the uniparty narrative coin you’re looking at

“Our system relies only on ‘trusted news sources’”

Lmao. lol.

Eh. Elon is just using content to honeypot the demographic that will come to be labeled by the government as “white Christian extremists”

It’s a trap imo.

I feel like the result would just be they’d get spammed so hard they couldn’t even interact with the public meaningfully, it would turn their communication into a one way street where they post shit but don’t wade through all the bullshit to see citizen’s feedback

Everything trends towards 0 when priced in bitcoin

I don’t make the rules 🤷‍♂️