Ross Ulbrict speaks. (Video liberated from Twitter.)
Hey I have family members too. Brings up an excellent question. At what point is something offensive? Because it doesn't offend me at all. That being said, if someone called them a retard to hurt them. I'd probably knock their teeth out.
Here's my take. -- I think everyones "psychological make up" is different. Not wrong or right, just different.
Some people take offense. Some don't. So who becomes the arbiter of speech? What can be said and what cannot.
Did you know that homeless people is an offensive term? It's supposed to be unhoused. Same with Blind.
Also it's not committed suicide, it's died by suicide.
None of this is meant to antagonize. It's alllll just stuff I think about.
Mine was a joke. I know they're not saluting because I'm not retarded. It was to point out the pettiness.
Block me for saying retard.
I'd never trust it's actually off. Go #grapheneos
Only if you like end to end encryption. If you don't care about that it's probably fine.
she's a retard
Do not vote for Pedro
VICTORY! After over a decade, a federal court has declared that warrantless backdoor searches of US person’s communications collected under Section 702 of FISA is unconstitutional. https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2025/01/victory-federal-court-finally-rules-backdoor-searches-702-data-unconstitutional
VICTORY! After over a decade, a federal court has declared that warrantless backdoor searches of US person’s communications collected under Section 702 of FISA is unconstitutional. https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2025/01/victory-federal-court-finally-rules-backdoor-searches-702-data-unconstitutional
If you really want something I guess Id say his rhetoric is what I disagree with the most.
On policy, take schedule F. I think it's mostly a gimmick and would not result in the downsizing of the federal government.
But I don't see the point really. We can debate a specific policy or rhetoric. My point is that delusional people can be found on all parts of the political spectrum. A natural distrust of elected officials is healthy and a founding concept.
So Trump, Biden or anyone else shouldnt be your savior. That's dangerous. Very dangerous.
My criticism isn't of trump. My criticism is blindly worshipping him or hating him.
Are you asking me if a criticism I have of Trump so we can debate that particular issue?
I think your misunderstanding who I'm criticizing.
Is the assertion that he can't make bad decisions? Not trying to get into a policy debate. I'm just saying that believing that someone is pure, infallible and can do no wrong is cult like behavior. It's the inverse of TDS.
TDS = everything trump does is evil and wrong because Trump did it.
Trump cult= if you criticize Trump you are wrong because Trump isn't wrong.
It's the same intellectual failure. There is no difference.
I think a balanced approach is best. There is a substantial portion of people who have the opposite of TDS. Where if you criticize Trump, you must be wrong. TDS is real. The Trump cult is also real. He should be viewed first in light of his actions. That is, if you can find an accurate account of his actions with the distorted mainstream media.