“Anyone who has followed the plight of Assange, Snowden, or others like them has likely wondered how we might ever expose the ruling elite ways of taking and maintaining power.

While we have most certainly caught them with their hand in the cookie jar, only a fool would think we have seen half of what they are doing. So how can we win against something we can’t see? How do we counter unknown malevolent geopolitical efforts?

We draw them out.

But how?

Just like the Allies did in North Africa during WWII, we should attack what the enemy runs on. For the Allies, this looked like attacking the German supply line of fuel. Our ruling class’s supply line of power is a fully automatic printer. Everybody now! … Money Printer go What?? … It go brrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr!”

#Union #Freedom #2A #Bitcoin

“Anyone who has followed the plight of Assange, Snowden, or others like them has likely wondered how we might ever expose the ruling elite ways of taking and maintaining power.

While we have most certainly caught them with their hand in the cookie jar, only a fool would think we have seen half of what they are doing. So how can we win against something we can’t see? How do we counter unknown malevolent geopolitical efforts?

We draw them out.

But how?

Just like the Allies did in North Africa during WWII, we should attack what the enemy runs on. For the Allies, this looked like attacking the German supply line of fuel. Our ruling class’s supply line of power is a fully automatic printer. Everybody now! … Money Printer go What?? … It go brrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr!”

#Union #Freedom #2A #Bitcoin

It is worth reading this whole article, but this was the highlight for me. (by Robert Malone)

"The reason to deploy censorship and psychological technology on the population is to maintain the status quo, which is favorable to some group, some elite group - the oligarchs, we could call them. They want to maintain the current status and they want to do it through possession of this kind of technology. What that does is it creates a situation, particularly in times of change, such as we're in right now, where the difference between the current situation and an optimal solution gets larger and larger and larger. Does that make sense? You're locking in one set of solutions. You're not allowing the culture, the environment, the economies, the governments to adapt to change. You're forcing them to stay in this current situation. The populace observes that their situation relative to what could be becomes worse and worse and worse. There's a larger and larger gap between an optimal solution and the current solution.

Eventually that gap gets so big that it can only be resolved in one way. And we know what that way is. We call it revolution, major social disruption. Now, if you allow free speech and interaction in exchange of ideas in a decentralized environment, what you have is incremental improvements. You never get to that point where the population is so frustrated because they've been locked into a bad set of solutions. You don't have those major disruptions. You have gradual incremental evolutionary change in a society towards a better and better set of solutions for whatever the problem sets are. But by allowing propaganda - “PSYOPs”, what we're doing is we're locking, certainly, the Western population, and increasingly the global population, into a suboptimal set of solutions. Now, one of the other things that happens when you have one of those major disruptions is the population at that point is looking...

Think of the French Revolution.

Think of any revolution.

Populations in general, the average person sees this as a mess. "It's not serving my interests. I'm being pushed just like the Argentines did into worse and worse economic situation. I'm going to revolt. We're going to have some major change." And what do they do? They will take some solution off the shelf, such as Marxism, that's never really been tested. Never worked when it has been tested, but it's sold to them as a solution set. And they'll go ahead and grab that. Not only do we have these sudden disruption events that we call revolutions and the failure to incrementally allow for evolution in society and economics, but we have the willingness of a population to accept and assimilate some solution that's pushed to them, something that's marketed to them that's never been tested before. That's how we end up with these messy situations.

I don't have time to go into all the nitty-gritties and the wiring diagrams and the relationship between CISA and the State Department and all that. We can see that, and I recommend to you the recent Mike Benz interview with Tucker Carlson as a real eye-opener for the whole arc of history about how this is developed. In these brief remarks, I wanted to make the point that if we allow this to happen, we immediately lose sovereignty, autonomy. Any concept of election integrity goes right out the window.

Remember, peer-reviewed, validated paper shows a 20 point difference. All Google has to do is twizzle some knobs and they can basically choose whoever is going to win and whatever party is going to win and what the policies are going to be in pretty much any nation-state in the world right now. But furthermore, if we allow this censorship propaganda, industrial complex to continue to grow and develop, we're going to be in a situation in which we lock the world into a set of suboptimal solutions and prevent it from evolving to give rise to a better world for all of us. With that, I'm going to conclude and thank you for your interest. Again, thank you for being here."

#grownostr

Wheel Falls Off United Boeing 777

I thought they were gonna "break Bitcoin" with it? We don't have ANYTHING?