Avatar
choke_this
c074ef91848c1d74a8639c82a1cdf73722b688472fc120843a23954a7c8b75d0
Low EQ troll, deplorable, dangerous, extremist, eclipsophile, Fiat slave.

Another early bitcoiner that sold many bitcoin, regrets it, and is now trying to cope by scamming people

All the low cost carriers are in trouble. Southwest is barely breaking even, and is rolling out more premium features to try to stop the bleeding.

There is a market niche to providing ultra low fares, but they also get absolutely zero premium passengers. All of their customers are very sensitive to inflation, and price increases, because it will be years before their wages catch up.

Airlines that have business travelers or contracts with major corporations are able to raise fares to match increases in fuel and labor costs, because businesses that need to fly have already raised their prices: they don’t need to wait a year and beg for a wage increase, like 100% of spirit’s customers do.

Replying to Avatar Guy Swann

I wish the nuance was as easy to explain. I work on trying to make it easier to understand, but when people are ignorant of how money even works, how do you then give an explanation that requires them to apply it? I agree that there needs to be an explanation, and the problem is that all you have to do is regurgitate nonsense propaganda we’ve been fed our whole lives to ā€œunderstandā€ the other narrative, and nobody asks the question, ā€œwell why do people buy it when they bought the other before?ā€

Again the answer is in the money.

Here’s an analogy that I use to help picture it, maybe this will help:

Imagine you have an honest winemaker, and a dishonest one. The honest winemaker uses high quality ingredients because they care about their product. The dishonest winemaker uses what is the standard. It’s good enough not to raise any eyebrows and he basically labels it the same as his competition.

The government prints trillions of dollars, wages take years to adjust to it, but input prices and business costs rise almost immediately.

The good winemaker refuses to compromise on the quality of their wine. He has to raise prices by 15% to keep selling a high quality product. The dishonest winemaker has no problem adding fake coloring, some Monsanto flavors, and then watering down the actual wine to keep the price the same.

The customers don’t get a 15% pay raise and won’t make up for that difference for a year minimum. Now they are poorer and have to budget on things they never had to before. They see that of the two wines they purchase, one just shot up in price, and the other stayed the consistent.

To them, the honest winemaker is a greedy asshole, while the dishonest one looks consistent and reliable.

The customer only budgeted for X to spend on wine, not X+15%, so they switch to the dishonest winemaker out of either anger at the honest one, which is doubly driven by the profits of the dishonest one who will gladly repeat the politicians stupid ā€œgreedy businessā€ bullshit and pay others to repeat it as well with their higher profit and revenue, or they switch out of simple poverty.

The CPI doesn’t account for quality or substance in products, only what customers buy. So CPI comes in at 1% that year, because the quality and ingredients of everything were degraded to make up for a broken, corrupt money. So when people say ā€œit was inflation,ā€ they don’t believe you, because they pay the same amount for wine…

The dishonest winemaker gains a massive influx of customers. The honest one goes out of business. And everyone takes the lesson that to value quality over price is a recipe for disaster, and lying is just ā€œa part of doing business.ā€

Do this for 60 years and you can rot the core of any nation on earth.

Wow, great analogy!!!

Replying to Avatar Sasker

I think Turismo is referencing working directly for Bitcoin, right?

This topic has been puzzling me as an entrepreneur, still doing the majority of work in the old systems. nostr:npub1s05p3ha7en49dv8429tkk07nnfa9pcwczkf5x5qrdraqshxdje9sq6eyhe ā€˜s book has me looking for a way to navigate these transitions personally and with our company. I salute all the companies like nostr:npub1ex7mdykw786qxvmtuls208uyxmn0hse95rfwsarvfde5yg6wy7jq6qvyt9 and nostr:npub15369wu3wzzar5fclhecyqfv683x69n6nhlg7rxqnsg2dydgxflpq3apswl that manage to operate on a Bitcoin standard. But also they work with the legacy world where needed right?

My intuition tells me that excluding many potential customers slows down the transition to BTC. Specifically, when compared to the approach where you serve the most people as possible. Regardless of what they pay you in.

It looks somewhat like saying ā€œI am not willing to collaborate with most of humanity until they adopt a bitcoin standardā€. This would slow us down more than necessary it looks like to me. What if we just 100x outperform everything as individuals and organisations? Wouldn’t that create far more proliferation, faster? On all fronts; from SoV, MoE to UoA?

Is the fundamental question ā€œwhat approach creates the most demand, without jeopardizing the degree of decentralization and security?ā€ Currently I think we work with clients from the legacy system and use BTC as a SoV for the created surplus. Aside from that we do anything we can to switch to decentralized protocols where possible. But I am unsure if I’m missing something. Should I look at it differently?

nostr:npub163t5ra75jmy5ahhkutnld0sjslff3v8eydy992d8hl40zcl50glsyz37ry fiat is just another good to be traded. An extra step in acquiring bitcoin. When the network of Bitcoin is 0.1% that of dollars, there is no need to only be paid in bitcoin….unless you sell something that bitcoiners exclusively use like hardware wallets.

Now, if slave money were not able to be sold for bitcoin, that is a different question entirely. In that case, I probably would start transitioning to a job that would pay me in bitcoin even if I were paid significantly less in terms of value.

Replying to Avatar ₿en Wehrman

https://nostrcheck.me/media/0018b7ee33fb253843639c62e292fec700a69a93b08ee374c5bda971c9b39564/1e45b7a3d88703cfa9dd8064ed23c5ea6f1c7ae02ccc1fe5c3d77be3349194a9.webp

Honestly at a loss for the people who still think chemtrails are a "conspiracy theory."

All you have to do is look up. That perpetual haze covering the sun every day is NOT natural, no matter how much wikipedia and the corporate media headlines tell you it is.

The health of humans, wildlife, and the planet are being suffocated from above. Please, PLEASE move this to the top of your rabbit-hole-diving list. I curated a playlist of resources you can start digging into tonight - trust me when I say there is no time to waste šŸ‘‡

https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLuGtfhmsMa-KOJRpRcfvwvZYmpfU3Kgyf

#geoengineering

The government is stealing from you, and has made some BS research to do this. This is not evidence of chem trails or any effective climate engineering - which at the current state of human technology, is akin to peeing in the Atlantic Ocean to cause sea level rise. CO2 and carbon emissions are a climate scam, in the same way that geoengineering is a scam. There aren’t enough aircraft with enough lifting capacity, by several orders of magnitude, to put a significant amount of anything in the atmosphere. Yes, you may see dozens of planes per day in your tiny piece of sky over your city, but the world is much, much bigger than you intuit.

I have a unique perspective on just how big the planet is, and how tiny we, and our planes are, in comparison. Not to mention the size of the sun itself, and the amount of energy that reaches the earth from the sun in 7 days, is more energy than humans have used in the entire history of humanity since we first started using fire. As much energy reaches the earth from the sun in 1 day, as humans have harnessed in the last 25 years (9125 days) Let’s start with some first principles, instead of conclusions.

This ā€œtheoryā€ is literally poisoning the well of knowledge and sunlight of truth that bitcoin represents.

I’m open to any rebuttals.

He’s a bit doughy and effeminate, not sure if he’s just another rich boy or too much seed oils?