Avatar
Kekel Nakamoto
c46c270e7ebbb889e9d9398fcdbea22d3e9c86bea4b3a51f28d0d025dfc8a873

Dear nostr:nprofile1qqst0xtvrqlqxm0j0qpfgkuqh0wgkzl4judkvgdgd0e4d8pnyytlqlgpz4mhxue69uhk2er9dchxummnw3ezumrpdejqzyrhwden5te0dehhxarj9emkjmn9ttrzhr,

why do you have a picture of a bear on your profile? Or is it a bear caught in a trap?

Why is this good news? Is it good to have a system fed by debt? Wouldn't you prefer something complete and stable, with a prominent future ahead? What happens when the debt system collapses?

Don't you need the network to be big enough (global)? Doesn't it need to grow to it's maturity where it's the standard? As long as it's still growing isn't it an "unfair" measurement? Right now it's measuring relative to its growth plus its intrinstic properties. So doesn't bitcoin network need to be complete in order to measure stuff against it using only its intrinstic properties?

Let’s imagine a hypothetical scenario where Bitcoin’s network growth freezes entirely — no new participants join, none leave, and adoption plateaus indefinitely. If we strip away the speculative frenzy around future adoption and focus purely on its current user base, how would Bitcoin’s price and purchasing power stabilize over time? Don't take the scenario literally but rather metaphorically. Essentially, what does Bitcoin’s ‘mature value’ look like once it’s no longer riding the wave of growth narratives, and its worth is driven solely by the utility its existing users derive from it? And how would it compare to its current phase?

That is okay, I love and incredibly appreciate the knowledge you share here and on podcasts. I could take that content on a daily basis, it's of great value and depth!