This thing works on incentives, in other words on game theory which assumes rational actors. If you are not one then situation is pretty helpless and it will be up to a chance on who will get the money after expiry.
Okay, now you have -2x value locked and effectively overpaid a lot for each plush. If you go dark then a CLTV expiry wildcard event is nearing and I may be lucky enough to get your locked money in addition to mine.
Are you a rational actor or you just hate me and ready to pay to inflict pain? What are your goals?
Sorry to hear, but if your LN backup file in Download folder is intact (it should be) then you can install https://github.com/akumaigorodski/wallet/releases/tag/2.4.28 and close channels.
Do you have any concrete suggestions? SAT is supported and in fact I was advocating for SAT denomination way before it was cool (in 2017).
It will be interesting to see where you, me and our products will be in about a year.
Adam Back is a funny boomer, l'll give him that.
nostr:note104gd2rlcxpfmmq227kllrq77qtp396wg6wa07574h7xjrw9h0v0szf4jt4
I'd offer to send you two more plushies with a discount.
Let's say I make 50% in profit from each plush (https://chat.openai.com/share/5219bcf8-5997-4a28-80b0-3d73546cdfb9).
I'd make a 50% discount for next two pushes, for you.
From my perspective, then, you've bought 2 plushies at their original price (while really you got 3 with a discount). I sold 3 plushies for the price of 2 and still profited from the 1st one.
The Trouble: a Bitcoin business protocol for enemies who trust no one in the world
https://sbw.app/posts/trouble/
Thoughts?
Suggestions?
For folks outside Tokyo, any questions you want to ask nostr:npub1sn0wdenkukak0d9dfczzeacvhkrgz92ak56egt7vdgzn8pv2wfqqhrjdv9?
The funny thing about this is I could ask him something about Ukraine, but he's been silent on this for a reason.
nostr:npub1sn0wdenkukak0d9dfczzeacvhkrgz92ak56egt7vdgzn8pv2wfqqhrjdv9 is a hostage in a country at war, the only thing he can do is support russia or at most be silent, being oh so much concerned about abstract privacy is the only thing he is allowed to do now.
Isn't this somehow ironic that he ended up in this situation? What if he was fighting with relatively good guys afterall if the guys he ended up with are 10 times worse?
nostr:note1r2rph2ju4tmdf6nxn7cen2tg647vazc0e0n24v3khgqaxp2e0p3s5tadh4
Imagine being a grown up man and caring about zaps
It's effectively the same as WoS with these things in play and them not being clear enough on their site which only communicates an ease of use.
I merely mean that any peer may turn out to be a node they control or have an agreement with.
You piece of fucking stupid shit, you useful russian idiot who were lecturing me on nazis in Ukraine, you are in no position to judge me, fuck you hope we will never meet in person.
It's a bit biased way to put it but my answer is: I'd rather be closer to Saylor et al and their billions than to plebs who enjoy running stuff on RPi, or whatever they do these days.
Probably, but eventually it will be adding various bugs until payments stop working one day because LN protocol is changing.
Yes, I was impressed when found out how relatively simple drivechain idea is technically.
Btw I have questions to both greenlight and economical side of LSP idea.
For greenlight, as far as I understand it outsources channel updates signing and refund destinations, but it should be able to do things like:
- publish an old channel state and let peer take all the funds (peer is greenlight).
- do nothing for long enough when peer publishes an old channel state and let them take all the funds.
If we trust them not to, this is a custodial solution.
For LSP, I would really like to know how well do current ones do and how much payment activity per channel on average do they need to be profitable.
off the top of my head, in LN you should also account for hardware failure, 0days, fee spikes which will destroy in-flight htlc resolution in broken channels, all of these not very predictable.
I assume you mean economically justified to make that channel opening tx.
Compared to what, then?
It will lose to zero fee bank payments I have now.
For my peer, it will lose to lending btc at 2+% return instead of putting them in a channel which does 5 small payments per year.
What is the probability channel will even live that long and not get force-closed?
No, not any technology but this very particular one where trusting the technology itself and nothing else is at the core of it.