No you haven't. You jumped from topic to topic between just using ad hominem.
Frankly I don't give a shit about the patch, because it won't affect me. And this is the reason I would oppose it and do what I can to render it useless (unless it is not already).
What do you mean by cost of overriding datacarrier? Changing the option value has zero cost and zero effect of ability of miners to mine ordinal transactions.
Why to be scared? A patch has 0 chances of adoption. Also there are ways to spam even without the discount. Senders have enough VC money to burn, they don't care about the discount. Let them feed the miners.
You are the one who proposed censorship. Justify it or fuck off
Well, I don't consider you an authority and fuck your definition in mouth. Who are you to tell everyone what transactions to send?
They are correct. And the consensus is not going to change, get it, unpolite troll!
No, I don't. But I also don't support communist patches that people like you want to force, because I think everyone deserves to pay the fees. So I will do whatever is needed to stop a patch.
Who defines what is normal? People are free to write custom scripts, that is the whole purpose of having script language there.
The patch won't work. I don't support the shitcoins, but I know how to work around a patch you have in mind and I will help people to do it, just to fuck you and teach to be more polite!
No one exploit here. Otherwise the whole segwit is an exploit. You get an advantage over a fair legacy wallet user, who pays the whole price. Stop using segwit and taproot addresses, then bark on other people using segwit discount!
Strowman. I didn't say they are not interconnected. The price of 1byte in block and 1byte in utxo set is very different for node operators, that's the point. Why did you brought utxo set issue in the first place then?
You are the troll here. Propose how to fix the "problem" and I explain why your "solution" sucks.
No, they don't. Additionally, you've shifted your thesis. Initially, you claimed they have an unfair advantage in inflating the UTXO set, which would be problematic if true. Now, you've changed the topic to block space instead of the UTXO set. Firstly, there's a significant distinction since I store the UTXO set on SSD and the blocks directory on HDD, which is more cost-effective. Secondly, when I send transactions, I receive a discount for SegWit data. They might leverage it more for a greater discount, but it's still fair as it follows the same rule for everyone. I also gain an advantage over someone using legacy addresses and overpaying for each transaction. They deserve it, and so do I. It's fair!
He is better in explaining than me. It is enough that I understand his reasoning. Your reasoning doesn't sound good to me and it doesn't look that anyone is going to make a consensus change or something to punish ordinals. Maybe because you and your clique are not polite, maybe because you are just wrong. I think it is both :) Learn how to speak to people, then open your mouth 😺