Where's the lie though? LOL. You really think I'm gonna have a discussion with an internet incel talking about what females do or don't do??? you sound like a twelve years old maybe it's time to log off and hit the books

you think you're building something in tech because you setting up a relay???? please be for real. "men are leading" yeah maybe there are important guys in tech but you ain't one of them. Just because you're born male like 4 billions other people doesn't mean you can claim other people's achievements. you still an in incel with a laptop in his mom basement.

what is YOUR contribution to civilization? You're out here looking like you're pushing 40 with a Snapchat filter, so I'm gonna go with zero.

The issue on Nostr isn't just trolls. I think there are a lot of mentally ill people on nostr. Like, you read some comments and it's really incoherent speech, when the person is completely uninhibited openly insulting people they don't know and having parasocial relationships with people they dont know either

Nothing wrong with bitcoin, it's a currency that a lot of people are passionate about and also a looot of people (the majority of the world) aren't interested in Bitcoin. It doesn't make them stupid or ignorant; it's just something they're not interested in. I'm sure you're not interested in a lot of things other people are passionate about.

It's just not just the fact that they only want to talk about Bitcoin, Even if someone brings up a different topic, everyone tries to steer the conversation back to Bitcoin in the replies. Everything have to revolve around Bitcoin. Personally, I don't mind it it just feel like a Bitcoin subreddit. I mean, I'd rather scroll through other social media platforms because they discuss a variety of topics. The only thing that bothers me is that they don't seem to understand why Nostr isn't taking off and becoming mainstream. Well, one reason is that it's all about Bitcoin, and let's face it, 98% of the world couldn't care less about Bitcoin. I get being passionate about something, but really to an outsider all this 'orange pill' and 'normies' talk sounds like cult languag

I dont think bluesky will replace twitter but at least people there talk about other subjects

he is 100% right, people here only want to talk about bitcoin and nostr

BTW I totally understand where they're coming from with good intentions, and I know that there might be some confusion about the sun's pros and cons. Just wanted to share my perspective on the debate. 😊

Yeah, you're probably right, but we can't know the exact number of people who died from skin cancer in the 1800s.

200 years ago life expectancy was 40 years, I don't think worrying about their skin condition or melanoma was their top concern when they were dealing with stuff like tuberculosis, typhoid fever, and the plague.

Saying that the sun and UV rays don't damage the skin or increase the risk of skin cancer is like saying smoking doesn't increase the risk of lung cancer. I really don't get this trend of questioning everything, it's like everyone's suddenly paranoid, like, "Hmm, everyone's lying to us." And I don't get it, is this supposed to be a battle?? On one side you've got a dermatologist who's spent over a decade studying all the cellular mechanisms of how the sun damages the skin backed by tons of research and on the other side you've got Steven Lubka, whose "favorite topic is the sun." So are we supposed to believe Steven just because he REALLY likes the sun and he's telling us "Don't worry guys, the sun's totally safe"???

BTW nobody's forcing you to avoid the sun or use a sunscreen, just like nobody's forcing people not to smoke. But the fact remains: the sun causes skin damage and increases the risk of skin cancer.