cd
WaffleWater
cd83a406c0526bed6ad067d37a9ccd2df2aea2a7d9810d6abc61bafb775d3cf1
Born to Fugg

Bits of a jpeg spread out across a large number of transactions which need to be converted back to hex format and put back together so you can see the content VS. Childporn picture right in the op return as easy to view and upload as drag and drop. And this is the same to you?

Replying to Avatar Lyn Alden

False, you're purposefully conflating a link to content with the content itself. Very dishonest

We will be lucky if its as innocent as monkey jpegs, seems like smut and kiddie porn are now going to be uploaded straight.to the chain.

Peer to peer cash system. Not peer to peer kiddie porn file sharing system. Sick fuck. I don't want that shit on my node, and that you're cool with it says everything I need to know about you.

This is obviously the Jack Mallets strategy. Why pay full price for sneakers when you can borrow money at a lower rate than your portfolio is appreciating. Take out loans and roll them over, dude is savvy AF. Probably sitting on a mountain of Bitcoin.

A link to a website with child porn images is not a child porn image. So...no, it doesn't. But if core gets its way it might.

Replying to Avatar Shinobi

Can't wait to have kiddie porn jpegs all over the bitcoin block chain. Filters are stupid and Bitcoin core is awesome!!!

Replying to Avatar Shinobi

Also running knots!!!

German turtleneck guy was a nice touch. I feel like bicycle girl might have a been a bit too winded. Overall great work, the whole thing had that really nice pharmaceutical ad vibe. I immediately felt like asking my doctor if Nostr is right for me.

Why is it when I look coin.dance/nodes on a daily basis the number of nodes running Bitcoin knots is a fairly steady slowly increasing number while the number of nodes running Core fluctuates up or down as much as 500 nodes on a given day. Can somebody help me understand this?

#knots

Nostr doesn't prove Im the original creator of any particular content, it just proves I shared it. So what's the point in having AI sign its own content?

No, I'm saying signatures don't prove anything about how content originated, whether its AI or Human. So how would AI signing its own content stop anyone from passing it off as authentic human content? AI signing its own content solves nothing.

How would that even work? AI provides cryographuc proof it generated xyz content, opportunistic human strips signature away and claims content as their own. Rinse repeat

How someone over the age of 40 can look back at their life, see how much the internet has changed absolutely everything since they grew up, and then fail to draw the parallel to Bitcoin is beyond me.

Controversial opinion: I think I'd much rather have a bloated UTXO set on my computer than any amount of child abuse jpegs.

Why are we all acting like op return spam is just going to be a bunch of silly monkeys, seems like it could very easily be stuff far more offensive and damaging. Try telling people they just have to download and store a few CP jpegs on their computer to be a fully sovereign bitcoiner, see how well that goes over.

Data is just data is a naively shit argument. A jpeg of some abused child is not the same as a UTXO. My bitcoin node is for keeping my personal copy of all past bitcoin transactions because it benefits me, it is not for keeping copies of your jpegs (disgusting or not) because you we're able to incentivise a miner. I don't profit from storing your photo collection on my computer, I don't care how much you want to pay a miner to put non bitcoin transaction data on the blockchsin, I'm not going to help you do it. Why is this a hard concept?

Cuz what you're describing isn't a bitcoin transaction, its data storage. Bitcoin is for Bitcoin transactions. If you want to upload your jpegs to the cloud, go to any of the plethora of failed shitcoins that are happy to help you. Meanwhile I'm going to run a node with filters.