I'm talking about this: https://github.com/nostr-protocol/nips/pull/685

These NWC extension has a "make_invoice" request that can entirely replace lnurl. You could just use this to "pay-to-npub" directly if the npub is running a NWC wallet with this capability

Do you prefer to be full raped instead? It's fine to be ideologically against the state, but unless you live in the woods, you need to deal with them throughout your life, you can't just pretend the votes of others do not affect you.

I thought the NIP47 nwc spec was expanded to allow receiving (i.e. being requested an invoice, generating one and sending it) over nostr.

Sad that no wallets nor clients picked that up...

Wasn't there a bounty for this since more than 1 year ago?

Big if true

Crank it to 11

I know what he's talking about and I agree, I don't vote myself.

You got the wrong impression. I like to argue for both sides, it either reinforces my existing opinion or it gives me more nuanced ones.

The underlying question is pragmatism vs principles and wether or not the answer should be the same everytime or case by case.

Is it really building a better world if it involves lowering standards of living, degrowth and depopulation?

You are ignoring reality but reality does not ignore you. Regardless of wether you vote or not, you will pay taxes.

Serious question: what do I need to do to get the firemen to show up in GTA V?

I need to obtain a firetruck somehow. I tried setting cars on fire, but only the police shows up. What more can I do?

You'll still be governed and taxed by pedos, regardless. Isn't there a scenario where it's justifiable to vote for the one that promises to tax you less?

I totally get your point but the devil's advocate would say that the public sphere still looks at each vote the same way: as a full endorsement.

Biden can claim that 75 million americans "endorsed him", even if that's obviously not true.

It just gives them an extra propaganda card to justify their power and actions.

That would be entertaining ngl

I'm honestly surprised that there is such an overwhelming preference for "not voting" in the replies. Very interesting.

I guess I expected that even anarchists might generally prefer to maximize their potential political impact within the existing system.

nostr:nevent1qqsg24qne708vevwmsd5nhz6q9snsyfl30mn7ynvmcgj9wqchf6467cpz4mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujumt0wd68ytnsw43qygxsm6lelvfda7qlg0tud9pfhduysy4vrexj65azqtdk4tr75j6xdspsgqqqqqqss2m0wk

I'm on the same boat, this is the most reasonable take for me.

Good point

So true. This is the inverse corollary of "no taxation without representation"

That's pretty much everywhere on Earth, there is no safe haven. Politics always naturally selects lying sociopaths.

It gives them "social legitimacy" if they can claim that millions voted for them. You might disagree with that or with wether or not that even matters.

They will still use that as propaganda and as theit main excuse.

What if 1 candidate promised to make your life significantly worse?

Isn't there any scenario where voting is justifiable on pragmatic grounds?