The drum beats louder.
If only there was some easy to implement universal tool to stop or at least slow down the scammers. Why, I'm sure if such a tool existed all communication platforms would immediately jump to adopt it to solve all of these tangential problems! They would have to be insane not to!
not a fan of this trend where companies don't put their phone number on their own website so you have to look on google maps instead
doesn't hurt to have a plan b tho 😉
If you can't feel your guts vibrating the bass is too low. I don't make the rules. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Looks like there is one HR position open at swan. If you haven't already, definitely bookmark bitcoinerjobs.com. https://bitcoinerjobs.com/job/1484377-people-business-partner-swan-bitcoin
Good luck in your search!
So we should just hold back all development because the government might decide to perceive lightning in a slightly more favorable light, maybe, if they're not having a bad day that day?
This is the opposite of cypherpunk. Lightning is obviously transmitting money. It is foolish to pretend otherwise.
The state attacks will continue until the leviathan is exhausted. They don't have a consistent legal framework. The framework itself is the attack vector. They will contort it in any way that suits their agenda. We can't win this fight playing by their rules.
TapAss moves every stablecoin user one step closer to a bitcoin standard. We will coopt the dollar and put it on bitcoin rails. Embrace, extend, extinguish. This is the path to victory.
Sometimes I get questions about various cryptocurrencies. I specialize in bitcoin so I can't give detailed answers but this is my mental framework:

Hard agree on the privacy point. I don't see a path for a heavily regulated onramp to really push on privacy. If we tried to push the envelope we would get shut down faster than you can say wasabi. Nobody wins in this scenario except the state. We need cypherpunks to advance the cause of privacy. Mad props to the mad lads making this a reality. Respect. ✊
As for self-custody, Swan puts a lot of emphasis on pushing people to take custody of their corn. I first became a customer because they were the only game in town with automated withdrawals.
Swan also caters to entire customer segments that are not able to self custody thanks to the regulatory state. Important not to lose sight of the reality on the ground. Many institutional customers are required to use regulated custodians. IRAs exist in a legal gray area; Swan chose the conservative path of custodial IRAs to avoid this legal risk. Other companies chose a different path. Again, I am happy that bitcoiners are pursuing all strategies. It makes the whole movement more resilient and more likely to succeed.
Bit of a reach there. Fortress is a different company from Prime with the same founder. Both companies partnered with Swan. It's not a deep market. There are not many choices for custodian integrations. The biggest issue is finding a custodian that can scale the seperate trust account for each customer model that swan uses. This model provides legal protection for customer funds in the event of custodian bankruptcy. Nobody else does this AFAIK.
BTW swan now supports multiple custodians. We are working to build a nice integration layer to bring on even more. Also, I can't say much about it but Swan is working on a very smart long play here. We're hard at work setting up a bitcoin only custodian.
I think your distaste for swan is way overblown. It's trendy to hate on swan but we are pursuing a unique strategy. Time will tell what strategy is most appropriate or who executes better but I, for one, am very glad to have multiple teams of bitcoiners trying all different approaches to solve the same problem.
It's easy to criticize builders. Much harder to build something from nothing. Ask yourself this: are you a net contributor or a net detractor to the cause of freedom technology?
Bankrupted and reborn? You got a citation for that?
Swan mining is not cloud mining. It is not on offer for retail. These are business deals between corporations with oversight and accountability.
You should be more careful to separate the concept of cloud mining from the scummy companies that have ruined this term in the minds of the public. I think we will need to build a robust market for hashrate in order to solve miner decentralization. Guess what that's called? Not cloud mining lol that phrase has been burned. The idea is sound. Execution has so far been extremely poor.
Same. I think it has to do with VC funding. As always, follow the money.
work it gurl!
Ah, too bad, sounds like it would have been an epic disc golf injury. I've been there. Stay on those orthopedic exercises to make sure you recover as much as possible. 💪
biking or disc golf?
feel better











