Just wow. Ignorant bureaucrats have 0 idea how software works.

Link?

Any other iOS users find posting from nostr:npub12vkcxr0luzwp8e673v29eqjhrr7p9vqq8asav85swaepclllj09sylpugg to be hit or miss?

It’s great for reading but I always end up swapping to another client to post. Either the “post” or “reply” doesn’t work or there’s weird typing issues with capital letters.

Agreed. Once I have some down time to think and write I’ll craft a response and share here. It’s the tools of control. The church abused written word and was the “government” of the time since they held the monopoly on violence.

Agreed. Once I have some down time to think and write I’ll craft a response and share here. It’s the tools of control. The church abused written word and was the “government” of the time since they held the monopoly on violence.

And glass.

I recommend checking if BDK has language bindings for RN. JavaScript isn’t the most secure language…

From a friend on FB where I shared this:

“This should prove to be an interesting debate between who would be responsible to stop the mathematical inequality that is doomed to arise in the economy. Here, you point the to government. And yes, they are the bad guy. BUT, when someone has to be the bad guy it needs to be the government. Just like when parents have to be the bad guy to set their children straight, and the children end up disliking the overbearing parents because of it. Someone does need to be the bad guy. Up until the 1800's it was the church and the church leveraged afterlife fear in order to garner subjugation of the masses. But now that the church has significantly less power, who is going to be the bad guy who had to do what must be done to set the math back to "fair". Check out the linked article, and I'll leave you with this quote from it.

"We find it noteworthy that the best-fitting model for empirical wealth distribution discovered so far is one that would be completely unstable without redistribution rather than one based on a supposed equilibrium of market forces. In fact, these mathematical models demonstrate that far from wealth trickling down to the poor, the natural inclination of wealth is to flow upward, so that the “natural” wealth distribution in a free-market economy is one of complete oligarchy. It is only redistribution that sets limits on inequality."

https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/is-inequality-inevitable/“

From a friend on FB where I shared this:

“This should prove to be an interesting debate between who would be responsible to stop the mathematical inequality that is doomed to arise in the economy. Here, you point the to government. And yes, they are the bad guy. BUT, when someone has to be the bad guy it needs to be the government. Just like when parents have to be the bad guy to set their children straight, and the children end up disliking the overbearing parents because of it. Someone does need to be the bad guy. Up until the 1800's it was the church and the church leveraged afterlife fear in order to garner subjugation of the masses. But now that the church has significantly less power, who is going to be the bad guy who had to do what must be done to set the math back to "fair". Check out the linked article, and I'll leave you with this quote from it.

"We find it noteworthy that the best-fitting model for empirical wealth distribution discovered so far is one that would be completely unstable without redistribution rather than one based on a supposed equilibrium of market forces. In fact, these mathematical models demonstrate that far from wealth trickling down to the poor, the natural inclination of wealth is to flow upward, so that the “natural” wealth distribution in a free-market economy is one of complete oligarchy. It is only redistribution that sets limits on inequality."

https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/is-inequality-inevitable/“

From a friend on FB where I shared this:

“This should prove to be an interesting debate between who would be responsible to stop the mathematical inequality that is doomed to arise in the economy. Here, you point the to government. And yes, they are the bad guy. BUT, when someone has to be the bad guy it needs to be the government. Just like when parents have to be the bad guy to set their children straight, and the children end up disliking the overbearing parents because of it. Someone does need to be the bad guy. Up until the 1800's it was the church and the church leveraged afterlife fear in order to garner subjugation of the masses. But now that the church has significantly less power, who is going to be the bad guy who had to do what must be done to set the math back to "fair". Check out the linked article, and I'll leave you with this quote from it.

"We find it noteworthy that the best-fitting model for empirical wealth distribution discovered so far is one that would be completely unstable without redistribution rather than one based on a supposed equilibrium of market forces. In fact, these mathematical models demonstrate that far from wealth trickling down to the poor, the natural inclination of wealth is to flow upward, so that the “natural” wealth distribution in a free-market economy is one of complete oligarchy. It is only redistribution that sets limits on inequality."

https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/is-inequality-inevitable/“

From a friend on FB where I shared this:

“This should prove to be an interesting debate between who would be responsible to stop the mathematical inequality that is doomed to arise in the economy. Here, you point the to government. And yes, they are the bad guy. BUT, when someone has to be the bad guy it needs to be the government. Just like when parents have to be the bad guy to set their children straight, and the children end up disliking the overbearing parents because of it. Someone does need to be the bad guy. Up until the 1800's it was the church and the church leveraged afterlife fear in order to garner subjugation of the masses. But now that the church has significantly less power, who is going to be the bad guy who had to do what must be done to set the math back to "fair". Check out the linked article, and I'll leave you with this quote from it.

"We find it noteworthy that the best-fitting model for empirical wealth distribution discovered so far is one that would be completely unstable without redistribution rather than one based on a supposed equilibrium of market forces. In fact, these mathematical models demonstrate that far from wealth trickling down to the poor, the natural inclination of wealth is to flow upward, so that the “natural” wealth distribution in a free-market economy is one of complete oligarchy. It is only redistribution that sets limits on inequality."

https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/is-inequality-inevitable/“

Is bip39 a library? How are you getting the entropy for seed generation with bip39?

Is that a Windows device?

The suits will be the most rugged when the economy finally tanks. They have the hopium from all their charts and “journalists”. Blue collar people will have it rough but they’re already figuring it out and have the most salable skills.

what do bitcoin off-ramps look like in Pakistan?

Oh, wtf?!? 🤢

✅ get up in there

What library underneath for the wallet stuff?

Do more pushups

read ingredient labels. Seed oils are everywhere.