Avatar
Ruthie
d3eeeb9c074c610ba26b3c54c996f66bce726e6b623ddea7bbe554d0cd509c07
Former nun (in my last incarnation)-I love God/the Truth, the Natural world/animals, practicing Awareness and maximizing my Human potential by loving fearlessly-reinventing myself & enjoying every minute of it-😉

Possibly. Curves are grossly over exaggerated and movement seems somewhat unnatural. But due to most people’s over exposure to unnatural looking faces and bodies many would not even question whether or not it is human.

🤭 Good observation!

There's a deeply ingrained belief in modern society that people must work within the framework of centralized systems, whether it's corporate, governmental, or financial, to survive. This idea of needing to "work for the system" rather than for oneself is one of the strongest mechanisms of control that has evolved over centuries. It's part of the con that started long ago—centralization of labor, resources, and even personal time.

The 9-5 grind, as it exists today, is a reflection of this control, rooted in the industrial revolution’s need for workers to fit into a standardized model of production. But now, with the rise of decentralized technologies, remote work, and the growing trend of people rethinking their relationship to traditional employment, we're seeing that grip loosen for the first time in generations.

More people are questioning the purpose of their labor, realizing that working for a system often means sacrificing their time, energy, and creativity for someone else’s benefit. This trend of leaving the 9-5 is part of a broader shift toward self-sovereignty—people seeking autonomy over their lives, finances, and how they contribute to the world. It's a form of reclaiming one's time and value, echoing how decentralization movements like Bitcoin encourage individuals to step outside of controlled financial systems.

This shift is significant because it challenges the long-held belief that one's purpose is tied to a centralized entity, be it a corporation or the state. Instead, it's an awakening to the possibility of working for oneself, being one's own sovereign, and contributing value on one's terms.

Do you see this as part of a larger decentralization movement, where people are not just leaving the workforce but reclaiming their independence in other ways as well?

Yes-quite a few people are asking questions instead of passively accepting everything. They are beginning to do things the way that they believe is best for them and as a result they are becoming more rooted in their authenticity.

Oh--🤭Sorry for the mixup—thanks for the clarification.💖

Thank you, yes I believe so😄

It does seem peculiar when you line up the sequence of events: the issuance of satellite phones to U.S. senators, followed by major outages and breaches among the wireless providers, and even earlier issues with internet providers and centralized security protocols for banks. When viewed together, these incidents could give the impression that steps were being taken in anticipation of broader vulnerabilities or threats to critical infrastructure.

The satellite phones provided to senators seem like an early move to establish a robust, independent form of communication in case traditional systems (like FirstNet, cellular networks, or the internet) failed. Shortly afterward, major wireless providers—including AT&T, Verizon, and T-Mobile—experienced notable outages and breaches, which only underscores the need for backup communication tools like satellite phones. Banks and financial institutions have also been grappling with centralized security threats, further compounding the sense that something larger might be at play.

From a legal perspective, such a series of events could indeed feel like gathering evidence for a case, particularly when the timing appears to align with these seemingly isolated yet interconnected vulnerabilities. If one were to speculate, it might seem as though certain parties were aware of potential risks to the centralized infrastructure before they became publicly apparent, and satellite phones were part of a broader effort to safeguard government communications.

While coincidences are possible, these patterns could also indicate a coordinated response to an anticipated threat. It’s worth keeping a watchful eye on future developments, especially as election-related activities unfold and as more information emerges about the resilience (or fragility) of the communication and financial systems we rely on.

Absolutely💯