Avatar
NewAtlantis
d582ea4464058383af89dbc571f72aaaaffd103aab3bbc8ddd2342e66d7e6b56
Creator of mememaps.net

So I just realized that all GUI’s are is basically just proxies for CLI commands, all GUI apps including Nostr apps and Webapps are just CLI wrappers

Has anyone really asked how does an AI aren’t make one’s life genuinely better?

I care much more about the bitcoin on their lightning nodes, also Primal doesn’t seem to support other lightning wallets…. Sorta gatekeeping a bit over there

Does anyone on here know what they would personally do with an Artificial Super Intelligent assistant?

If you can’t regulate what you eat what makes you think you can lead,regulate, a team of people?

What does your quest graph look like?

What is the most important software you personally wrote?

Would Plato advocate against AI the same way socrates advocated against writing?

I guess we need a metadata tag NIP for others to label this kind of Nostr event

Replying to Avatar Ghost of Truth

EU’s Fiat Gambit: Leveraging Geopolitical Chaos to Mask Economic Decay

The political shift in the White House reveals that the world is moving toward a radical economic bifurcation. One side, led by the United States, is relying more and more on free market forces while cutting government spending (think of Argentina), while the other side is falling back on old-fashioned recipes of socialism, state interventionism and the rotten recipe book of Keynesian magic which will only lead them deeper into the unavoidable debt trap as it is an illusion to be able to control interest rates without consequences like massive inflation and currency debasement.

A glance at the history books of the 20th century already tells us the outcome of this test of strength: decentralized systems that entrust decision-making powers to the individual will always carry off the laurels of the victor. They are simply channelling scarce ressources like energy better than other systems. Without anticipating the point I would like to make: it will not be the Europeans who rely more than ever on centralization and the consolidation of power in Brussels who will be receiving economic laurel.

The European Union is betting big these days, hijacking the U.S. pullback from the Ukrainian battle field and monetizing Russia-stoked fears politically to roll out a mammoth €800 billion fiat credit blitz, this time as the South has been sucked dry over the years led by german debt issue, to dodge its spiraling growth crisis and keep rolling the debt over space and time. We all know the keynesian logic: all economic misery has its roots in a lack of demand which certainly the all-knowing government will fill up with hyper intelligent government spending programs.

What we are witnessing here is a reckless dive into the Keynesian debt pit. Meanwhile recession signals scream loud: February 2025’s composite PMI sits at a dismal 48.9, stuck below the neutral measurment of 50 for months. Industry and the construction sector in particular are at rock bottom and show hardly any signs of revitalization, even if the business cycle is picking up a little speed globally. Industrial output is tanking with a 0.6% monthly slide in January,now with a PMI at 47.6 deep in recessionary territory hammered by high energy prices and supply woes. Deficits are swelling to 4% of GDP in 2025, with debt-to-GDP nearing 90% by 2026 (point of no return usually can be find at around 80%), per the European Commission. Productivity’s a ghost and it stays flat for the time being.

Once again, it was the bond market that reacted quickly to the geopolitical impact of Germany's gigantic debt program, which is now trying to close the gap with the other European debtor countries. Bond markets pounced on Germany’s debt reveal: 10-year yields leapt 40 basis points within two days after the announcement of the new german debt fiesta - Germany’s from 2.4% to 2.8%, Italy’s from 3.6% to 4.0%, France’s from 3.1% to 3.5%- defying the ECB’s 0.25-point rate cut.

That €800 billion tab that follows step by step the debt structure proposed by ex ECB president Mario Draghi last year to give the dead Eurozone a last stroke. The program follows Draghi's proposal like a little dog follows its drunken owner. It comes with €22.4 billion in annual interest, a chokehold on a wobbly economy. Worse, it’s a catalyst for centralization. Subsidies soared 15% last year, per EU data, propping up dying industries, while regulations - like new green and digital mandates - pile on €22 billion in yearly costs, per the European Chamber of Commerce, suffocating innovation.

What we are experiencing here in Europe is the path to common debt, the suspension of the last Maastricht rules which, looking back today, we can say was probably the plan of the fiat centralists from the very beginning, since cheap credit is the drug they are all addicted to since cheap credit is the drug they are all addicted to and with which they are getting the population drunk. Every election cycle is always a gift-giving contest, the presentation of false hopes and simulation games, the creation of false security and prosperity, in the forge of the central banks' printing presses, brought into the world by politicians whose distance from economic reality has become maximum.

But if there is one thing the Europeans understand, it is how to turn self-created crises into an advantage for the centralized body of power in brussels. In their understanding of economics, prosperity comes from well-organized central planning, which implies communal debt, or more simply, using Germany's creditworthiness to force more credit on others. We can therefore expect the imminent introduction of Eurobonds to further expand the nonsensical credit programs of the past decades and accelerate the massive capital shortfall, which will further inhibit productivity, especially in the eurozone. In this way, Europe will not be able to translate technological progress into active production and prosperity.

Debt slaves nations to bond markets, demanding risk premiums as trust fades and puts the onus on taxpayers to divert ever larger portions of productive capital into channels into which it seeps away without bringing further progress. Germany’s debt brake is toast (it has always been an illusion, since political actions, even when written into constitutions, are reversible at any time) and the CDU’s cynical push through a defunct Bundestag reeks of desperation.

Remember: the CDU is the party that was still pretending to have Christian-conservative values during the Merkel era, while executing the green-socialist agenda of decomposition in a way that even the heirs of the GDR SED and their green socialist brothers and sisters in the West did not dare to dream of.

The whole german economy was built as a charade within a fog of narratives which over the past two decades has essentially been a kind of euro mercantilism: a domestically low-wage sector coupled with a currency that was undervalued by 30 to 40% for the German economy. Massive trade surpluses (the narrative of world export champion Germany) ensured booming foreign credit business and an enormous dependence of the entire eurozone on the creditworthiness of the German economy. At the end of the past few years, the Brussels-Berlin policy, since the attack on the nuclear industry such as the automotive industry and the phasing out of nuclear power, has affected the German economy to such an extent that the spectre of recession in the form of Germany's sinking lead is now haunting the whole of Europe.

In what creative german politicians call “Special funds” (which is officially unconstitutional) they're hiding their reckless spending now, sticking taxpayers with the bill. This is centralized control masquerading as rescue—industry fades, productivity dies, and the crash of the hole economic bubble nears.

#EU #DebtCrisis #Recession #Bitcoin #Nostr #Grownostr #Fiat #IndustrialDecline #FiatPonzi #Eurozone #Euro #StackerNews #Nostr #germany #debtspiral

Cool it with the AI slop

Replying to Avatar HODL

Here’s a structured, detailed rebuttal addressing each point:

⸻

1. Bitcoin as Digital Gold vs. P2P Cash:

While it’s true that Bitcoin’s narrative has evolved toward being viewed as “digital gold,” this shift doesn’t invalidate Bitcoin’s original purpose. The volatility and institutional adoption actually strengthen its case as a credible asset class, providing a foundation for broader acceptance. Bitcoin’s Layer 2 solutions (e.g., Lightning Network) directly address transactional usability. Adoption stages matter: gold initially functioned as money before becoming a stable reserve asset; Bitcoin may follow a similar trajectory—first storing value securely, then serving widely as a transactional medium as infrastructure matures.

⸻

2. “Reserves” and Distribution:

Your analogy about cold wallets as “reserves” insightfully highlights current wealth concentration. However, Bitcoin’s transparent ledger ensures visibility and accountability unmatched in traditional finance. Historically, every new monetary asset (gold, fiat, real estate) began concentrated and gradually dispersed with adoption and market mechanisms. Bitcoin remains far more accessible than traditional reserve assets; fractional ownership and decentralized exchanges provide pathways for wealth dispersion. The critical distinction is that early adopters assume substantial risk and uncertainty, earning their position through conviction, not institutional privilege. Future distribution improves as Bitcoin adoption increases and newcomers continuously acquire smaller, fractional amounts—an organic redistribution mechanism impossible in traditional finance.

⸻

3. The Role of Governments and Corporations:

Yes, governmental and corporate involvement is undeniable. Yet this doesn’t inherently threaten Bitcoin’s decentralization; instead, it legitimizes the network and accelerates adoption. Bitcoin’s design resists centralized control through cryptographic security, full-node validation, and open participation—no single entity or government can rewrite its fundamental rules without widespread consensus. Furthermore, governmental involvement underscores Bitcoin’s growing strategic importance, proving it is robust enough to challenge traditional systems without compromising its underlying decentralization. Their involvement may actually safeguard Bitcoin, ensuring regulatory clarity that can accelerate mainstream adoption without undermining core decentralization.

⸻

4. Scarcity and the Hard Cap:

Bitcoin’s hard cap and resulting scarcity are precisely why it’s valuable: they prevent arbitrary monetary expansion, protecting individual purchasing power. Early adopters gaining wealth is a temporary phenomenon, common across all historically successful technologies. Over time, many early adopters naturally distribute their holdings into broader society (as they spend, invest, or diversify), countering the notion of a permanently centralized elite. Moreover, market manipulation via large holdings becomes progressively harder and economically irrational as liquidity deepens with growing global adoption. Bitcoin’s transparent ledger also offers unprecedented public accountability, minimizing the risk of covert manipulations common in traditional markets.

⸻

5. The Missed Opportunity for Change:

While integrating Bitcoin into ETFs or the traditional financial system may seem antithetical to its revolutionary potential, it doesn’t necessarily dilute its transformative power. Rather, ETFs represent an onboarding bridge, allowing massive institutional liquidity and broader public adoption. This integration doesn’t mean Bitcoin loses its decentralization or censorship-resistance; it merely becomes easier for the public to access through regulated channels. Over time, increased education and exposure via mainstream avenues enable individuals to realize Bitcoin’s deeper capabilities—self-custody, financial sovereignty, and independence from intermediaries. Thus, mainstream adoption through existing infrastructure can strengthen rather than diminish Bitcoin’s revolutionary nature by expanding the base of empowered users.

⸻

6. The Future You Foresee (Dystopian Elite Control):

While understandable, this dystopian scenario underestimates the uniquely decentralized properties of Bitcoin. Unlike traditional finance, Bitcoin’s open-source nature, permissionless network participation, cryptographic security, and transparent ledger significantly limit the influence a small elite can exert, even if they hold substantial amounts. Attempting dominance through hoarding would incentivize competition and innovation elsewhere—such as other cryptographic solutions or competing economic structures—and would reduce Bitcoin’s own relevance. Additionally, Bitcoin empowers financial sovereignty through private key ownership. Users retain ultimate control, unlike existing financial systems where power structures are enforced by institutional gatekeepers. The technology structurally redistributes financial power away from centralized gatekeepers toward individuals, thus inherently counteracting persistent elite domination.

⸻

Conclusion:

Your concerns are legitimate and highlight important questions surrounding Bitcoin’s future. Yet Bitcoin’s decentralized architecture, open access, transparency, and cryptographic integrity fundamentally differentiate it from traditional finance. Rather than replicating old hierarchies, Bitcoin provides the technological framework for genuine economic democratization—though achieving it requires continuous vigilance, education, and active participation by the broader community.

Bro cool it with the AI slop

Religion is a domesticating force

It seems like BAP is more of a vibe philosopher