if you have questions about the whole OP_RETURN discussion and want to educate yourself, here is a 40 question Q&A put together by nostr:nprofile1qyxhwumn8ghj7mn0wvhxcmmvqyf8wumn8ghj7ur4wfcxcetsv9njuetnqqs9r742wut5rt24z58w8z095pht6632g24fg99d8urxc9m09snxzkcqa2fpe and nostr:nprofile1qy88wumn8ghj7mn0wvhxcmmv9uq36amnwvaz7tmwdaehgu3wvf5hgcm0d9hx2u3wwdhkx6tpdshsqgy4xcdzks4zds3t4sakk6aych9vf5mfqm4se7ucy6rgr3z6xqw9rqdwmzvs
https://stacker.news/items/978404
Should I read this out loud on nostr:nprofile1qyxhwumn8ghj7mn0wvhxcmmvqywhwumn8ghj7mn0wd68yttsw43zuam9d3kx7unyv4ezumn9wsqzq7q8pqp9qg6mz0y0keaw4u6q7fxr8pzmy3cw0hw8asx5psqxsfj9w2rsvz for those who will never actually read the written words?
I don't know how to read so yes
Does strike fraud department usually call you?
This is a fake email yeah?
that's illegal
does it hang to the right or the left
out the closet? finally
I'm not an artist
The bch crowd is taking advantage of all the Bitcoiners living here now
gm
u trying to @ me bro
#asknostr
Hey nostr:nprofile1qqsxwkuyle67y94tj378gw8w2xw2wa6nwmwlqhddlwnz0z7sztsaw2qpz9mhxue69uhkummnw3ezuamfdejj7qg4waehxw309aex2mrp0yhxgctdw4eju6t09uq3jamnwvaz7tmjv4kxz7fwwdhx7un59eek7cmfv9kz7ex47xm I figure you're the guy to ask here. If I'm building a coinjoin but want to *consolidate* two outputs from separate participants which are going to the same recipient, how can all participants validate that their coins are accounted for in the outputs *without* sharing their destinations and amounts with all other participants? I assume this is possible, but I'm struggling to construct it.
ex
A sending 1BTC to D
B sending 1BTC to E
C sending 2BTC to D
Ideally, the outputs would be
3BTC to D
1BTC to E
But how can participants differentiate that from
2BTC to D
1BTC to E
1BTC to F
(without knowing the destinations of each participant's coins, ruining all unlinkability)
I've had a few ideas, but I've run into a brick wall every time. Blinded addition seems not to be useful, since you need to first prove you have contributed enough in inputs which seems to necessitate linking your blinded value to the inputs, ahead of time, negating the value of blinded addition?
I hope I'm missing something obvious (or even a paper doing exactly this?)
dang I need to log in over here more often
test