Avatar
Mysth
d920bbbdef05491eaf72de8827ca788bc03542fc482c89f8beb58b965213849e
tu ne cede malis, sed contra audentior ito Better a warrior in a garden, than a gardener in a war. Stay humble and study #Bitcoin.

You don’t need to always choose violence bro.

Fuck the blue checks, however not all blue checks are the same.

Why not both?

How to meet people irl if you don’t have a common channel to coordinate?

If the goal is to meet nostr people irl, then no problem but you’ve already won.

If the goal is to bring people over here and have them abandon the panopticons, you need to first meet them where they’re at.

Why not ?

If you don’t use these tools to warn people about their danger they pose to freedom and free speech, how would you actually warn them en masse ?

The hate of Saylor coming from shitcoiners and nocoiners alike tells us all we need to know about them. 🫔

#beerstr šŸ«”ā˜˜ļø

Replying to Avatar arkinox

Nostr enables the ONLY social network that has a chance at gaining mass market adoption AND has the potential to utilize POW for spam deterrence. No other clown world VC-funded ESG company will ever even consider using proof of work for anything.

One of the first arguments I always hear against POW is that raising the cost of posting a note will make it so only those with large amounts of hashpower will be able to post notes, and they will dominate the protocol with spam and psyops.

This argument doesn't make sense because if large entities will see value in expending their hashpower to spam nostr, then why aren't they spamming nostr right now while the cost to do so is absolutely free? They should be here already if it is worth their time to be, but it is not dominating nostr at all.

The fallacy is the assertion that those with great hashpower actually care to spend it spamming nostr only when it isn't free. In reality, they would rather spend that hashpower on ROI, like mining bitcoin. The ROI on spamming nostr will likely never match the ROI of spamming other social networks that have no POW cost.

When a normal user posts a dozen notes per day, the cost of adding a modest POW requirement is barely noticeable — roughly a webpage load time worth of waiting. But for a spammer, this cost becomes a material electrical expense that will reduce their capacity to spam. And with a dozen other social networks more popular than nostr, where do you think they will spend their time? Spamming the networks with zero POW costs, of course.

But, putting this POW barrier over nostr would allow legitimate users to flee to nostr for a spam- free experience while keeping spammers out. It could actually help nostr grow in its network effects.

Overall, I am shocked at how bearish people are on proof-of-work, especially bitcoiners.

I’d even say we could add a POW requirement in the key pairs creation, like roughly 24h of work for a median 2023 CPU ; this would deter spammers even more if they know that every time they get banned by relays they’d have to spend a day to recreate just one account. Arguably with bot farms it could go way faster than a day, but that’s still a deterrent for spammers that would only impact normal users very slightly.

Verify me harder El🤔n

Harsh but fair.

Used an OTU address, 0 mail received.

Replying to Avatar Gigi

GM

Good meme.

Replying to Avatar Gigi

Lightning, but it's "BuIlT On B🤔Se"

I usually tell these people:

It’s irrefutable that the Covid treatment doesn’t prevent both infection and transmission…

… so why would you want both the Covid risks AND the jab risks?

If they don’t understand, that’s when I see they are already dead inside anyway.