gm everyone trying to get transactions done before the mempool shitshow begins
No, the hardware is really only meant to be used as part of the whole system.
Nope, it generates as many receive addresses as you need
Going to be talking about the onchain vault that I made with OP_CAT on the optech spaces this week. Swing by if you want to hear about using fun schnorr tricks in script to do transaction introspection (Id argue its closer to transaction assertion but w/e)
made a prototype vault using OP_CAT: https://github.com/taproot-wizards/purrfect_vault
cool features include partial enforcement of inputs/outputs, and inspecting state in a previous parent transaction. also loads of spaghetti
fullrbf is awesome
In one ear and out the other? What do you think happens if someone activates CTV too early?
I love how you ignore all the critical points I laid out. Just use mempool filtering software. Your software is an attack, there’s no PR that’s going to fix that. Where’s nostr:npub1lh273a4wpkup00stw8dzqjvvrqrfdrv2v3v4t8pynuezlfe5vjnsnaa9nk when we need ‘em?
After running this, some transactions that used to be valid wont be any more. Nodes that are running old software will be able to validate their own transactions without needing to run any new software.
“Patches welcome” means “if you have an idea to make this better, send me a pr and ill take a look!”
Nothing undermines whatever point youre trying to make like going straight to name calling. Take a step back, and get your emotions under control.
What do you think a UASF is? Its a group of people saying “we are going to start enforcing new consensus rules”. If those people are in the economic majority, then their fork wins. If not, it looses. Thats what bitcoin consensus is. Its the rules enforced by the economic majority.
If you are convinced that the economic majority of nodes thinks that inscriptions are invalid transactions, then you should enforce that rule. If you think that the economic majority of nodes think inscriptions are valid transactions, then enforcing that rule puts you on a minority chain.
You dont have to trust my intentions. If bitcoin only works with good intentions, bitcoin fails. Bitcoin works because of open source code and economics. This is the exact same, except its much shorter code.
You get to run whatever code you want on your computer. If you dont understand that, you should not be using bitcoin
You should think harder about what this does
People seem to think that they are invalid. If the economic majority believes that, then they can do something about it. Otherwise, they are valid transactions.
What part of this is disingenuous?
You dont have to trust me. Its open source. Its a short script. Read it yourself. Or pay someone to read it and explain it to you. This is how bitcoin works