Avatar
Currency of Distrust
da26e54b86c9a395a4233cbb540fe2aa93cdad4a9b657ed5a724efed5859d23d
Christian | Husband | Father Professional hacker Lover of freedom tech

I really enjoyed this article about how LLMs “fool” people into believing they’re actually intelligent. I especially enjoyed this because at a corporate event, I got to see Oz the Mentalist who was incredible.

He did literally every single one of the things mentioned in this article. Down to interviewing people before the show, but did it in this crazy sly way that didn’t make you suspicious.

Anyway, for quite a while, I was genuinely dumb founded by how many intelligent people I knew were constantly spouting “wait til GPT-6 bro!” When I’d tell them LLMs are dumb and just fancy autocomplete.

But I’ve been reading more and more and I realized two things. First, it’s great marketing but second, people are so hopeless these days, they’re hoping a rock we’ve tricked into doing math will eliminate the bad things in their lives. Spoiler: it wont.

https://softwarecrisis.dev/letters/llmentalist/

#ai

Man, I hate Reddit. Filled with a bunch of rent seekers who don’t want to do anything for themselves. Every time I post something, which is super rare anymore, I’m immediately greeted by morons who always think they know better than everyone else.

And don’t dare suggest someone take the harder path in a situation. You’re an absolute monster if you don’t just affirm that one should always take the easy path. Ughhhh….

wtf does Saylor mean an AI can custody bitcoin? How the fuck is it going to do that?

Replying to Avatar Lyn Alden

It’s not so common that I go to bat for Elon Musk, so listen up.

People are too tribal. They can’t separate individual things from broader things. Specifics matter for credibility.

For example, I am often critical of Musk on Tesla or Twitter, but way less so against SpaceX. Details matter.

I think Musk is greatly dishonest, lacks integrity, is more of a hypeman than an engineer himself, his Tesla promises are literally all like a decade late and thus directly harm their buyers, etc. Kind of a cult, but it keeps the market cap up and enables financing. I’ve called him a cuck for dictators and I stand by it.

But I rarely say anything against SpaceX, other than to remind people that it’s largely government funded, so you know who he reports to as he builds that amazing company out. But it’s a good thing.

Musk cucks for dictators on Twitter to happily take down their opposed comments at a higher rate than pre-Musk Twitter did, as long as they have big markets for Teslas and SpaceX rockets, and as long as he can market himself as the “free speech guy” in the US while we don’t pay attention to where he helps dictators clamp down harder.

And yet, the Tesla pay package that was agreed on is what it is. Sure, he hyped up the equity, but he did it at such a successful scale that the fundamentals were impacted positively as well. He successfully memed Tesla into solvency. To backtrack on that pay package would make no sense. I would support the pay package while disagreeing elsewhere. Rule of law matters.

The Tesla permabears, like Jim Chanos (Diogenes) in the recent tweet below sort through any news item for a bearish comment. I see others do it for bitcoin or Nvidia all the time.

Am I bearish on Tesla? Kind of. Relative to bitcoin in the long run, absolutely.

But imo, fade the permabears. Find people who can’t separate various specifics, and disregard them.

Be someone who can be bullish on one thing and bearish on another, even from the same person. Dislike someone, and rule in their favor out of objectivity when it is right. Like someone, and yet rule against them when it is wrong.

Anyway, good evening.

Such a great take. I agree completely. He’s definitely a hype man who is obviously dishonest at times, but it doesn’t mean 100% of what he does is bad. The same goes for literally all people, including politicians, even though that take will upset some people here. Unfortunately, the ratio of good to bad is usually extremely skewed and that makes it really hard to acknowledge the good 😅

Wild. I’ve noticed they keep advertising the same couple roles too. All around, they seem like a cluster fuck.

I had an opportunity to interview with them recently, but two different people reached out to schedule, both of which were pretty high on the org chart. Felt very disorganized, so I declined. Sounds like it was a good choice haha

Replacing it will make very little difference, if any. Most of these EDRs are extremely similar and only vary slightly in performance. So the only benefit would be if you’re hoping to get them to MS or another vendor. But running a business that is any bigger than say 50-100 employees without EDR is very unlikely, especially for regulated entities.

So, there’s no real difference or any party other than competitors that bebwfit

The answer is that they won’t be off it without replacing it…

Crowdstrike is primarily for business customers. Typically, nearly every business is under some type of obligation or expectation to run EDR software. So even if these companies go off crowdstrike, the expectation will be that they go to another provider. Generally, they’ll turn to Microsoft for Defender for Endpoint, which is more advanced than the Defender that comes preinstalled in windows.

We are too dependent on tech as a society. We have almost no resiliency when it doesn’t work. My only hope is that people start to realize this and start to unplug more.

The debates im mostly seeing aren’t even considering the govt wasn’t part of it. They’re just debating whether it was staged or real 😂

From what I’ve heard, the timeline is pretty tight. He was spotted while getting into position and seemed to only have a few moments to get his shot. So idk, I still doubt it.

I don’t know enough about his involvement in the other things you mentioned to have an opinion. I just personally don’t think the deep state is capable of keeping it a secret that he’s part of them. Someone else pointed this out yesterday, but it seems more likely that they wanted him to be a part of it but once he rejected Epstein the knives came out. I have no idea, I’m not firmly convinced of anything but the probability this is a false flag feels very small to me.

Replying to Avatar LogicallyMinded

I don’t have a definitive opinion on what took place with the #TrumpAssassination attempt but it is very unlikely that this event was allowed to happen because of a negligence of the secret service.

What are the chance that the secret service would have failed to secure the building on which the the shooter was posted? Plus, how can we explain that the counter sniper let the terrorist fired first when he had him in visual minutes before the shooting started? These two facts most likely indicate an intent within the chain of command to let it happened.

Now the question that remains is whether or not the intent was to conduct the assassination of #Trump or to fake an assassination attempt on Trump.

While it seems egregious to entertain the latter, I don’t think we should definitely exclude it yet. Although, I haven’t seen any evidence supporting the « fake assassination » scenario, it wouldn’t be the most complicated #FalseFlag to execute especially when compared to other much larger false flag operations that took place.

The element that would really make me reconsider the possibility of this scenario is if it turned out that a bullet certainly pierced Trump’s ear. Until, we have more information on this element it’s not to be excluded that the terrorist shot at the crowd without actually directly aiming at Trump.

In the scenario where it was a real assassination attempt, the #DeepState totally failed its operation and made their enemy (Trump) stronger.

In the scenario where it was a fake assassination attempt, the execution by the deep state was flawless and Trump’s posture as the enemy of the deeps state is being reinforced (although he’s a deep state asset). There are also many other ways this operation would benefit the deep state. One of which would be to unite the American population behind a strong leader in preparation of a #WW3.

If it were a fake, the SS would have to be complicit in carrying that out. I don’t really see that happening. Also, no way they’d risk shooting that close to Trump for a fake.