And what, then, are women to think, that aren't capable of bearing children? Do they get test-driven for a few years and then thrown out for being inadequate breeders?
Romantic love is supposed to protect women in such situations from abandonment.
Besides, men can have children with many different women. That's not enough to make those women unique, in his eyes.
Theoretically, yes. In reality, no. I have a 2000-follow account and a 200-follow account, both with the filter, and nearly-identical feeds.
It is the old adage, at work:
The people you know, know more people than you do.
So, adding more people adds surprisingly little because of the tendency for everyone to follow a subset of people.
There are a few big islands, often separated by language, but the focus within each island is on a subset of 10% or so.
Well, that's what nostr.band has done, but my idea is a novel type.
Patent it. 😂
The relationship and experiencing romantic love is the point of the excersize. Children are possible, but not necessary, fruits of the excersize.
Here is another example. This note shot up into the trends, but it has a flat structure and the original poster has never replied or written anything else. No human interaction, despite so many replies. We all just look silly.
Yes, I mention that in the other comment. Nothing short or too repetitive or similar. "GM" "Good morning" "Hi" "Yo" is all the same thing.
You would also want to filter out anything too reply-guy-ish. Sometimes discussions break out in GM threads, but sometimes it's just a string of GMs, so you'd filter out the second type.
The two metrics don't overlap here because so many big accounts are migrations or links from other platforms and not accounts grown organically here.
Women are at a strong disadvantage, once a relationship has begun, so his initial ardor is reassuring.
If he shows no excitement, how can she know he will stay? Does he even see her as something "more" than other women, or is he just with her due to laziness?
No, I still see it.
The man initiating is preferable because it conveys a conscious selection.
Women are generally "pickier", so there's more information in him "picking', as we can expect her response to be more selective than his is.
I don't really understand what he's talking about. Or is it just sort of general discontentment?
That's why it seems like a dead space, unless you follow the right plebs.
And, as soon as you follow them, your feed explodes in interhuman conversations.
"Yo, where can I get my chat on?"- button.
I've never been trending on primal. That's hilarious. Must be because I'm talking to you, or something.