Avatar
John Christensen
dd69612be7f061eb93d0eb85889d11acf211f19741cea6b13a842f963024c0d8

It makes me sad that profile pictures are not standardized between nostr clients. Lynn‘s profile picture shows up fine in Primal, but in Damus I get a default profile picture. The same thing is true for banner images. I just wish there were some kind of a standard for this kind of thing.

My concern with the power law is its broad range. It’s like saying, "We know the price will be between $100 and $1,000,000 within the next 1000 years," which is obviously an exaggeration, but it highlights the issue.

Another aspect I want to explore is whether the power law applies to currencies other than the US dollar. If it doesn’t hold true in other currencies, then there’s no reason to assume it should in US dollars either. And if the power law once worked in another currency but then broke down, it suggests that it could also fail in the US dollar.

I’m not trying to dismiss the power law. To be honest, for a while, it brought me a lot of excitement. No matter what model you consider, the trend always seems to point up and to the right.

Here’s a thought: Gold served as a great form of money for many reasons, and most people would agree. The main issue with gold, however, is its size and weight, making it difficult to transport. To solve this, paper certificates redeemable for gold were introduced. The problem was that the issuers of these certificates could issue more than the gold they actually had, leading to a lack of trust.

The real issue wasn’t the idea of issuing paper certificates but the inability to verify that the number of certificates matched the gold held by the issuer. Instead of focusing on scaling Bitcoin, perhaps we should focus on solving the verification problem. If we could easily verify that the number of issued certificates corresponds exactly to the Bitcoin held by the issuer, scaling wouldn’t be an issue, and we could trust third parties because we could verify their claims.

The U.S. might as well start handing out "World's #1 Sanctioner" souvenir mugs to tourists!

Who knew trying to control the world could cause so much chaos? But seriously, when your sanctions are so intense they push countries to invent whole new financial systems just to avoid you, maybe it's time to reconsider the strategy. Sanctions: making enemies and global economic shifts, one country at a time!

100k is not that far off. And I am interested in having conversations about it. I believe that the problems will be solved by clever engineering. I just like talking about it. I find it fascinating talking about the different potential architectures and the trade-offs for each one. It’s conversations like this that help build the solutions.

I can’t tell if you are serious or joking.

AI bots are showing up more on social media lately, helping with things like customer service and content creation. It might be tempting to let them take over, especially when you're under pressure to keep up with everything. But while AI can be a great tool, there's a big difference between using it to help and letting it run the show.

AI can be really useful for things like writing better comments, coming up with ideas, or explaining tricky thoughts. It can help you get your message across clearly, which is great if you struggle with words or want to make your ideas easier to understand. With AI's help, you can put your best foot forward, making your posts sharper without losing your own voice.

But if you let AI handle everything, you might lose something important—your authenticity. Social media is meant for human connection. People follow you because they care about what *you* have to say, not what a machine says. If AI takes over, it won't feel like you anymore, and people might notice. Over time, this could hurt your connection with your audience as they realize they're not really engaging with a person.

The trick is to find a balance. Use AI as a tool to make your work easier, but don't let it replace you. This way, your social media stays true to who you are, while still benefiting from what AI can do. You can keep your personal touch, but with a bit of extra polish.

In the end, AI can help you a lot with social media, but it shouldn't take over. A balanced approach lets you stay authentic while making the most of AI’s strengths. Social media is all about connecting with others, and that's something only you—not a machine—can truly offer.

P.S. this comment was written by an AI😂

Debating decentralization on centralized platforms, no system’s perfect, but isn’t that the whole point? We’re all just figuring it out as we go. Bitcoin wasn’t perfect at the start either, but look where it is now. Nostr’s on its own path, and that’s pretty cool to see.