Avatar
nout
deba271e547767bd6d8eec75eece5615db317a03b07f459134b03e7236005655
Chief user experience complainer. Head of FOMO.

sending signed events directly into your brain with neuralink πŸ€”

nostr:note1llt4ktn4tgfcj5kglc2vk5mzatugcwhnmgl5rypfnv8h57jsgcfspp35uu

Replying to Avatar waxwing

Did you ever stop and *really* think about what it means to "do a Satoshi Nakamoto"?

Context for my weird question: I have met many, many bitcoiners over the years. Many of them take a stab at keeping privacy by doing some combo of: not revealing name, not revealing location, not revealing face. Etc. So often, if I happen to meet them in person, they end up revealing the things that they were hiding online. Quite literally a mask came off (pre covid!) once we started drinking - a simple, funny anecdotal example of what I mean. Many complain about photos being taken, many focus on always using a pseudonym. I'm sure most people reading recognize these patterns of behaviour.

I can see the purpose, up to a point, so this is not criticism. It's a little like me doing coinjoin "here and there" - you don't expect to defend yourself against a hyper powerful aggressor, only against a casual criminal looking for an easy score.

But if you do want *real* defence against *strong* attackers, you have a huge problem. These half-measures will be useless, perhaps worse than that, if you get overconfident, because the determined investigator only needs *one* strand to pull on, and the measures I describe above, which are almost always rules only half-stuck to anyway, don't cut it, at all.

Which brings me to my point: is it even possible to "go all the way"? Clearly it is; Satoshi Nakamoto is not the only person who's ever done it, but it's pretty damn rare at the very least.

Imagine what it would mean. If you are engaged in a serious project, that takes let's say at least a year's worth of full time work, then you are going to do that for no reward. Not just, no money, people do that quite often when it comes to things they genuinely enjoy, but no recognition, no social context, not even "oh I won't bother you because I know you're busy with that project". Nobody will say that because nobody will know. Imagine doing a full, intense 8 hour day of work (more likely, split over many days) and knowing that there will *never* be a direct reward of any form, for that. And then doing it again, and again.

What's more, you don't just "not get a reward". You have to do almost double the work, to ensure that at every step, every pushed commit or technical discussion, does not expose anything at the network trace level, or the language, vocabulary etc. Managing tricky pseudonym accounts, handling the headaches of Tor etc. I'm not trying to say it needs super-genius level tech skills, I'm trying to say it's a massive amount of effort.

Could you do that? I daren't even ask the question of myself, because I'm almost sure it's a no. But to *imagine* where that kind of motivation would come from, that's what fascinates me.

I think a good reality check on all these "privacy" solutions is to read the darknet bible, or more expanded details in "The Hitchhiker’s Guide to Online Anonymity".

My son can't fall asleep because he's too tired and he's too tired because he can't fall asleep. 😱

Good, son. Keep going πŸ‡πŸ•³οΈ

This app is just a key to individual freedom...

That would make it much harder to be a dictator.

Scammers never want to talk to me πŸ˜₯

The strap is the mountaineering configuration

Perfect, test it so I don't have to 😁 I don't really have a coffee crash as others mentioned, so not sure why should I replace #coffee.

That said I only rarely talk about Bitcoin. I'm not trying to create a following, I'm not going for numbers, so I just post whatever comes to mind...

Life changing tip: If you buy flip flops or slides, get one size bigger than your usual size, especially if you are a man. Thank me with sats.

I'm obsidian maximalist, but UI minimalist, so I hide all these sidebars and buttons... 😊

This is one of the posts that I would be worried posting on centralized media, but I trust in Nostr to handle ok-ish.

I noticed an interesting "conflict" on social media (Nostr included) about the war and specifically in Ukraine.

We have a person (A) that lives in (or has close association with) Ukraine, their friends have died, their homes are under attack by an army holding Russian flag. They want to defend their home, they fight back, they want to destroy the group that's trying take over their home.

We have another person (B) that takes the perspective of how war is pointless, how it's actually being caused, financed and controlled by either specific country (USA, Germany, China, etc) or a specific shadow group to gain some advantage on the geopolitical field. Person (B) suggests that we should dethrone those shadow groups, we should remove their power, we should not participate in their wars.

First person (A) vents with some specific event/situation on Nostr, Twitter, etc and person (B) replies with their perspective and suggest that person (A) should not participate on the war or explains their virtue in some way. This triggers person (A) since they have only two options - flee their home (risky), or defend it against the group attacking (risky).

And now (A) and (B) go back and forth, providing more arguments to support their vantage point perspective. But the thing is - they are both right and they agree with each other aggressively without knowing it. They just talk in different layers and timeframes of the situation that don't really intersect.

My hope is that highlighting this disconnect will help (A) and (B) actually connect on the shared cause for freedom and peace.