Avatar
<old>cypherhoodlum
e17273fbad387f52e0c8102dcfc8d8310e56afb8f4ac4e7653e58c8d5f8abf12
I try to avoid posting from this profile. npub1h00dlum44jnxdjeqms0d9s0l0n0lslv84mcw5420qpu277d8y4mqpv0cnf <-- my main profile

I just became a 150 follows maximalist. The Nostr's web of trust capabilities takes care of the rest.

zap.stream nuked my following list. Aw shit here we go again.

Consider turning off all notifications and see what that does to your brain

Also it should've popped onto my feeds a lot more by now if it was any good

A western dualistic view sees the two opposites as two distinct things when a buddhist would probably say they are in fact the same thing. One gives meaning to the other. In fact there is no one without the other.

However, not all dualistic examples are opposites. The classic example; there are no bees without flowers. A dualistic view sees bees and flowers as two distinct things while a buddhist sees them as the same organism due to the fact that they "emerge" together.

That the gods are not omnibenevolent and some even encourage war, nothing to do with ontology.

Buddhists might argue that peace has no meaning without war and such a dualistic view is nonsense to begin with.

Defending the position of there being a single omnipotent, omnibenevolent and omnipresent god is a lot trickier, not sure how people rationalize that.

Replying to Avatar corndalorian

It's funny 'cause it's true