e4
Herengone
e4070372672b6970b0a217438bcbf8643c574efdb6d25f7eb816f6b8f3baf11e
My principal's gear towards privacy, freedom and respect but I'm human and occasionally mistakenly express brief uniformed contradictions. Btw, it's Sanskrit for "Freedom"

Thank you Nulled, getting on that now. That's why I asked for a zap, I figured it was the fastest route to getting directions.

I have one, I just don't know how to connect it on the Amethyst interface.

Yeah, that's why I was asking I haven't figured out how to set that up on Amethyst, which is what I nostr on.

Can someone please zap me?

I wonder what these people would be doing without the ability to do so?

Replying to Avatar L0la L33tz

So the Trump's 'crypto* EO is out, and I'm seeing lots of weak bitches cry that its a shitcoin reserve.

Given the fact that the proposed digital assets stockpile would possibly be built on *seized* coins, let me give you a quick introduction to forfeiture law, and why crying for daddy to please please make its pile of flying horseshit "bitcoin only" *literally* the most retarded thing you could be wishing for, ever.

Forfeiture law – or civil asset forfeiture, to be precise – is this fun little game the government plays in which it does not have to accuse you of a crime to confiscate your property.

Instead of accusing you of a crime, the Government claims that the asset itself has facilitated a crime, and can therefore be seized by the Government.

In civil asset forfeiture, there is no innocent until proven guilty. To get your property back, *you* have to prove that the Government is wrong – which turns out pretty complicated seeing how its impossible to prove a negative.

Civil asset forfeiture results in cases that are not filed against a person, but filed against the property itself. This results in fun little cases like US vs. Binance Account XYZ, or US vs. 123 Wilmington Drive.

To extend this idea to Bitcoin, in a civil forfeiture case, the US Government is in theory able to seize *any bitcoin* that has *ever* come out of a criminal transaction.

Made some bitcoin for selling a service? Bought some bitcoin on a P2P exchange? Unless you checked that the UTXO you received has never touched a criminal transaction in its entire history, your coins can be confiscated, and there's pretty much nothing you can do about it.

As Cato Institute points out in its piece on civil forfeiture reform, forfeiture law is routinely misused to enrich the Government – Philadelphia, for example, has seized over 1000 homes, over 3000 vehicles, and over $44M in cash over an 11 year period. In 2010, the city tried to seize *an entire fucking house* because a woman's grandson sold less than $200 of weed out of the basement.

If you think that taxes are bad, civil asset forfeiture is straight up evil.

It doesn't matter whether you participated in a crime. It doesn't matter whether you know that someone else participated in a crime. If it involved your property, even if said property was fully legally acquired, the Government will come and take it.

Civil asset forfeiture is the most insane Government funding technique that is out there, and you most definitely do not want this declared as a strategic means to pump the Government's bitcoin bags.

You are *literally* asking the Government to steal your coins with a practice that *every* libertarian advocate wants to see abolished.

Civil asset forfeiture is straight up unconstitutional in its current form, so essentially hypocritical and yes I can truly say the self proclaimed authorities love this mafia tactic. Using the war on drugs as a major excuse to falsely justify the mass implementation of it.

The Bitcoin bug is what guided me here but glad to hear it pal

He won't be for long after he's convicted of his crimes. The man forgot to pardon himself for Christ sakes. It is surprising though, usually someone just coming out of the spotlight like that isn't even considered but I suppose every entity scraps their principles and values eventually if it benefits them these days. Welp, Biden is now one with the deep state, not much use though being in near full blown dementia.

Idk, Devin Nunes and Trump's streaming service is independent and definitely non-woke. The cool thing is they don't rely on any outside providers to run their service and can't be shut down.

Replying to Avatar BrianFitzwater

Earn Bitcoin Daily with Me

Referral Code: MNGUL40RCFL

https://emberfund.onelink.me/ljTI/l4g18zii?mining_referrer_id=MNGUL40RCFL

Yes I’m shilling. Why? Because 12 sats per hour per fren! Just for clicking a button every day on an app - another way we stack sats.

Im pretty sure most here already have an account, but for the ones that don’t you should consider it. It’s freedom money at the click of a button.

Its not freedom if you're the product.

Both those babes are built right

So by, Jan 20th 2029? I'll take that bet. Is there a place you wanna lock it in? Or are you saying you made the bet already?

James K Polk

When he took office on March 4, 1845, Polk, at 49, became the youngest man at the time to assume the presidency. According to a story told decades later by George Bancroft, Polk set four clearly defined goals for his administration:

Reestablish the Independent Treasury System;

Reduce tariffs;

Acquire some or all of Oregon Country:

Acquire/buy California and New Mexico from Mexico.

Pledged to serve only one term, he accomplished all these objectives in just four years.

We better see Ross free tomorrow or you're gonna lose a lot of trust my guy