The only sensible reason not to stack sats is stacking (Mo)neros.

Opt-out by nostr:npub1tr4dstaptd2sp98h7hlysp8qle6mw7wmauhfkgz3rmxdd8ndprusnw2y5g was a great podcast covering a wider spectrum.

In general no. But you should generate a new subadress for every exchange. There is an attack vector, where colluding exchanges with the help of chainanalysis could potentially link ringCT if you use the same receive address over and over again.

You don't want donations in Monero? Why? You can easily enable it in btcpayserver.

I hope most of you Bitcoiners also have loaded your bags with Monero as it is about to enter its bull market.

The stars are aligning for the underdog that in many ways represents Satoshi's idea more closely than Bitcoin itself.

GM. Get Monero!

Sure. There are many ways to fuck up your operational security.

That's why we do #Monero and Bitcoin for separation of money and state.

This may be a stupid question to the gods of #nostr. nostr:npub180cvv07tjdrrgpa0j7j7tmnyl2yr6yr7l8j4s3evf6u64th6gkwsyjh6w6

Are we able to create double-decentralised (P2P) relayes? (e.g. with the help of protocols like IPFS or similar)?

Meaning we have n relays {A, B, C, D, x} which is decentralised but may develop some form of centralisation similar to many L2 networks in the future.

But now each of those relayes or at least some are powered by a P2P server less structure?

Wouldn't that mean nostr becomes indistructable?

I am definitely looking forward to privacy improvements in LN. I just wouldn't recommend it to people who don't know about their risk profile (95%+). Those who know about the weakspots of Monero, LN or CJ will act accordingly.

Open for suggestions?

Separation of money and state and the roles of Bitcoin and Monero.

Why not use #Monero?

If you care about a good store of value aka digital gold use Bitcoin.

If you care about your privacy and a fungible currency utilise Monero aka digital cash.

What then? I am quite sure you are.

Maybe because some of us are early Bitcoiners as well, who are worried about the path Bitcoin is heading for.

What is it then? Bitcoin des created LN as a scaling technology not a privacy fix.

Obviously the author understands how to write code. Unfortunately that doesn't mean he understands where the pretty good privacy asumptions might get you criminalized/busted now, in the past or in the future.

I am a big fan of SeedSigner. Have built quite a few devices in the last months and I love it.

Do you by chance plan to support Monero in the future as well?

That's pretty poor marketing. Do you think Bitcoiners/Austrians would have ever started to utilise Bitcoin if it had a "pretty good" limited supply.

nostr:nevent1qqsvjq5rrf64q4sy9u6my95wpnt63sf58d0dyfzxtgqs28jxhkrspyqpz3mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujumn0wd68ytnzvupzpk4kccr9csumnwhmpv83ladqc6p88089cx2e5s2c4448ppgl2pakqvzqqqqqqykx2yu0

I am not in the business of comprising my privacy. And many others once they manage enough wealth will not comprise on their privacy either.

There's a reason why darknet markets got rid of Bitcoin including LN. If your freedom is on the line "pretty good" privacy is simply not good enough. You want the best.

Personally I solely use Bitcoin as a store of value next to Monero. I earn and spend solely in Monero and if someone sends me some LN payment or other crypto I convert it to Monero before doing anything else with it.

Monero is digital cash.

Bitcoin is digital gold.