Oh my, I thought your started that thing here 💜 So, where party?
that's so romantic
This touches indeed on the most basic questions...
But, isn't all you're saying there the opposite of proof of work?
You: "faster"
I: Is that 'better'? Why?
You: "more convemient"
I: convenience kills us (in every possible sense, really)
You: "more accurate"
I: (supposingly) "more accurate" but acording to what? As itteration, as confirmation bias, in order to get to an unknown spot; there is no accuration, I guess, there is hard work and indeed a bit of "birth pain", I suppose
As I said, the digital is crucial, for exchanging, distribution, decentralization... all sorts of sh...
but all that needs a 'material base/ foundation'...
Hui, I'll really end up 'internalizing bitcoin as base layer 'good object' here"💟
Akito! You are great... what a list 😂
Still, feliing relaxed and comfortable is not what I am looking for here.
The main problem here is strcuture; so ever old hypothesis, thesis, synthesis challenge - it sounds like succession but I think it's rather simultaneity... I cannot archieve that digitally...
I know a lot of writers are working with papers, scissors, glue and tape - for them the digital is just a distribution/ representation matter but has nothing to do with the production side of things...
I think I start to understand why...
Still, whenever getting 'blind' again I wil lrecheck your kind list💜
#boomstr
#asknostr
Up to what number of pages can you handle digitally (writing)?
There must be a boomer hiding in me: when it comes to more than 20 pages I am totally incapeable of doing it digitally only... I just get blind and immediatly lost in the docs...
Love the digital; need the analogue.
GM btw
#freudstr
Freud on transparency in 'tech':
„Nun scheiden sich, wenn Sie ausführlich Bericht über Technik und Erfolge geben, für Sie zwei Wege. Entweder Sie teilen dies mit, oder Sie verschweigen es. Letzteres, wie Sie sich denken können, ist unwürdig. Was man in der Technik tut, muss man auch öffentlich vertreten.“
(Briefwechsel: Freud & Ferenczi, 1930)
Butchered translation:
"Now, if you give a detailed report on technique and successes, you will have two different paths. Either you share this or you hide it. The latter, as you will assume, is undignified. What you do in technique, you have to represent (stand up for) publicly.”
(Correspondence: Freud & Ferenczi, 1930)
Ha, amazing, I just found this among my great grandmoms stuff... taht is around the same time.
Ha, amazing, I just found this among my great grandmoms stuff... taht is around the same time.
I know, you're so biased there
Even tho; I usually even miss the 'heartbreakingly charming' part there...
I mean if it comes to Germany, obviously...
Morning💟
No! You saw my last post and haven't proposed yet? ♬ It's a damn shame...
Note to myself: you really gotta work on that impatience of yours
Me: Ahhh, can't wait
even tho I consider it to be the total macro picture 🤣
Stella, love... are you still hung up in that little vicious mirror circle there?
but hold it.. you zapped yourself 8.701 sats yourself?
you're even mor needy than I am ;))
Tell me how pls!
I am trying it ever since.
I thought that might serve as a helpful definition ... besides all the usual suspect defs of course.. 💟
3 questions:
1) Why da heck would you consider censoring whatever in the first place?
2) What da heck makes you thing you even can?
3) Why aren't you able to love? (no, I am not talking size here)