There is a special place in hell for those who slip small functional changes into a major refactors, all in a single commit, with the commit message being like "clean up variables".
According to JarosΕaw Wolski[1] the drones that violated Polish airspace last night consisted of two groups:
- Shahed/Geran strike drones that after enterng PL airspace turned south and then west towards rargets in UA, taking a long way to avoid UA defences
- Gerbera decoys that flew in random directions deep into Poland
The Gerberas may've been disoriented by UA electronic warfare, but the Shaheds were definitely intentional.
[1]: https://nitter.net/wolski_jaros/status/1965701781205225473#m
nostr:nprofile1qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnddaehgu3wwp6kyqpqwp9sgh3sf35zshel4e6ptw975nt8unypwsn4d8s9fhmjljc6kl4q60n8jx
well... I heard US has a different approach to life, more like "you should take risks and get absolutely screwed when you make a mistake, that's how life works"
I was talkng more about Europe
nostr:nprofile1qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnddaehgu3wwp6kyqpq4tzv64xa8j8zmskjgukj0uj449csrzqctaap2tukymxcc8txcagqrjq955
bo nie ma
nostr:nprofile1qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnddaehgu3wwp6kyqpq4tzv64xa8j8zmskjgukj0uj449csrzqctaap2tukymxcc8txcagqrjq955
yeah, why?
nostr:nprofile1qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnddaehgu3wwp6kyqpqxzph26ctgluluhk0mcd0qn7sj9u0wvjentym6a345j6vsuk0qrmqpnhkdp
nostr:nprofile1qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnddaehgu3wwp6kyqpq234mrv59pg3dpq9e49rwh99qslkm8e35la09uq6r22zmc88gja9qpxtyfl matrix green
nostr:nprofile1qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnddaehgu3wwp6kyqpqp450apv3j8jmqjct3ddfklzusxyfkkyqpzxx4p33u099xjzvfwwsjlkxk4
for a second I thought you meant --insecure will prevent the use of Basic Auth and I got scared
nostr:nprofile1qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnddaehgu3wwp6kyqpqf8e6w3kg6cptk4ljl09ua3vezr7gws4jcuwyvzdnpytsnlp2yd6spdnlst
yeah that shouldn't be allowed
should the state decide to have a market for one of those things instead, the state must make sure at least one market participant satisfies the above criteria (eg. subsidize one telco to keep 2G around)
the state should be required to provide:
- post services
- some form of broadcast medium (radio or TV)
- some form of 1-to-1 synchronous communication (telephony or IM)
- any other infrastructure that a law may require a citizen to use
to every citizen, in such a way that the citizen:
- doesn't need to have any special device, or
- can buy a device will stay compatible with the infrastructure for the next 50 years
nostr:nprofile1qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnddaehgu3wwp6kyqpq4w84mkg3k3mwkcuqzth39rdq04ruwrzjvarxqfcd3yc6x27ytl4sy8p3jt
have you seen the sun tho?
nostr:nprofile1qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnddaehgu3wwp6kyqpqeazh5v3mssjnwuazeypawsw4wwpaxjcu76jn2s0589c0qyf9wshskf4kfy
which is why I said intended thickness
nostr:nprofile1qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnddaehgu3wwp6kyqpqx2vc8gu0kj2slcujhkd2y684k32e2zhzn78d2quea4tajn9ql2pqunvqps
i thought most of the power usage is the screen? at least on phones that don't have excessive amounts of malware
is a smartphone's battery life proportional to its (intended) thickness? :thinking_hard:
nostr:nprofile1qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnddaehgu3wwp6kyqpqq0k7r0h8npv8a4963tj53x9wah8tzz2uyykratgm53j4tgs9ajas2r6q5v
imagine pulling of that kind of exploit and not makng an nom virus rhat spreads through packages uploaded by its victims... what a wasted opportunity
Stop calling smartphones "microcomputers".
A full-size computer (mainframe) is the size of a room
A minicomputer is the size of a fridge
A microcomputer fits on your desk, but I'd say it's at least the size of your keyboard (like C64).
So a smartphone should be called a nanocomouter.
nostr:nprofile1qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnddaehgu3wwp6kyqpq5ufc4ns07vjn8j8lj83c55dyr2cn56ql4d37pdu780n7jkhtsgyse2ln70
nostr:nprofile1qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnddaehgu3wwp6kyqpqq0k7r0h8npv8a4963tj53x9wah8tzz2uyykratgm53j4tgs9ajas2r6q5v
Except email is the last universally-accepted communication medium that's a federated open protocol.
I think it's worth saving, and the client UI could be improved, considering that the information like Return-Path, DKIM signature, and SPF check results are already present in the headers
nostr:nprofile1qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnddaehgu3wwp6kyqpq4w84mkg3k3mwkcuqzth39rdq04ruwrzjvarxqfcd3yc6x27ytl4sy8p3jt
and merging features in RC period. I think your stance on merging features in the RC period is pretty clear.
nostr:nprofile1qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnddaehgu3wwp6kyqpqswzw096pc8es4scaxkyswsxzgnfpsqtqug8rep0jgcequq4amc2sgl9lu6 does anyone hope that we will discover better descriptions of reality that are both simpler and more accurate at the same time?
I finally remember why I quit studying physics:
In IT, when a solution is disgusting, it because of human imperfection. It ciuld always be better.
In physics, when a solution is disgustng, lt's because that's how nature behaves and that disgusting equation will never go away.
nostr:nprofile1qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnddaehgu3wwp6kyqpq8g0yrl4t9aezeuj9vjjwfhhkfwyzws5alsak7kdx63ea6cwn6h9s8a9ww5 nostr:nprofile1qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnddaehgu3wwp6kyqpqmh5a6mhm4u78glqxhltq7uexv6kddphycthlguvn0ux8ch72tc8qxpmj4q
beware, for the pen is now being replaced by machine-generated bullshit!
Rough times are coming for those seeking scientific truth.
nostr:nprofile1qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnddaehgu3wwp6kyqpq6c2fsg7fp3yxte9ugd9yhcdpa68h924asv5d6pvm5nc37a3nkzmq3th7ka the part about the author is a bit of an afterthought, my main point is that I wanted to use a piece of software I thought was cool and very useful, but I read its source code first and I was thoroughly disappointed.
And it's not like other software I use is necessarily better, but having high standards means not knowing how something works under the hood may be the only way for me to be happy using it.
nostr:nprofile1qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnddaehgu3wwp6kyqpq6c2fsg7fp3yxte9ugd9yhcdpa68h924asv5d6pvm5nc37a3nkzmq3th7ka because you may find out the code does something horrible, and that will make it more difficult to like the program, or to admire person who wrote it
Never read the source code of your heroes /hj
nostr:nprofile1qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnddaehgu3wwp6kyqpqzkheuq5dhyh9p42x9l6cxlke2t2p4x79y9ylhh4yt07qmnxhcmvsug3ruv nostr:nprofile1qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnddaehgu3wwp6kyqpqp450apv3j8jmqjct3ddfklzusxyfkkyqpzxx4p33u099xjzvfwwsjlkxk4 We don't need to.
You cam voice your own opinion what is reasonable. It can be different than mine. And that's fine.
We don't need a consensus. I'm not proposing an action. I'm just complaining.
nostr:nprofile1qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnddaehgu3wwp6kyqpqp450apv3j8jmqjct3ddfklzusxyfkkyqpzxx4p33u099xjzvfwwsjlkxk4 both are using unreasonable amounts of GPUs
nostr:nprofile1qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnddaehgu3wwp6kyqpqmh5a6mhm4u78glqxhltq7uexv6kddphycthlguvn0ux8ch72tc8qxpmj4q nostr:nprofile1qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnddaehgu3wwp6kyqpqdy9pfvdgeyxlkxq2k2k3wu4pk9talvwafz5dqpwum5ac20zgn3cq6xtwnt can't watch the vid at the moment, but based on your description:
Isn't the whole point of diesel to have continuous isobaric heat addition? How do you achieve that if your mixture all combusts simultaneously? Or is this a different thermodynamic cycle?
nostr:nprofile1qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnddaehgu3wwp6kyqpqmh5a6mhm4u78glqxhltq7uexv6kddphycthlguvn0ux8ch72tc8qxpmj4q
three levels of bishop hats:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zucchetto (purple variant)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biretta (purple variant)