I don't think Americans are ready for this debate yet. #handegg

*Opening nostr and seeing everyone talking about the Superbowl*

A friend asked me today why I’ve never tried to monetize.

The reason I’ve never taken any money for being a thinkboi/shitposter/professional clown whatever… is because it would undercut the message.

Bitcoin is going up forever, but I need you the average pleb to buy some bullshit off me? Nah.

I do well when Bitcoin goes up. End of story.

With a few notable exceptions, I always question the conviction/motive of those who need to monetize their followers.

Sats > clout

Fun fact... every CMS, Budgeting, and Aggregator system Ive built that operates at scale offers CRUD, but the delete is always a soft delete and the data is retained indefinitely for archival. I assume other enterprise systems over the past few decades share this trait

The people should realize and most of them already are but we keep lying to ourselves. Whatever you post on the internet stays on the internet. It's the most basic fact everyone should get into their minds.

The delete button is only a farce.

unbiased is a funny term for Tucker )

can't say I agree. Putin is a person who used to talk with domestic journalists who only ask authorized questions. if you were more familiar with the situation you'd realize that Tucker didn't ask any tough questions, and didn't rise any uncomfortable topics. Except maybe the gas pipe

I see your point. agree.

> Engaging with President Putin's arguments could potentially start a dialogue. But as he says, this has been categorically prohibited.

There is a post from BBC (not sure) journalist who says that they sending daily request to interview Putin but he refuses.

One of the most important evaluation criteria of a publishing system, regardless of its type, is how it implements the basic operations of Create, Modify, Delete. This is a standard that we no longer question at the operating system level. However, when it comes to anything we put on the public network, these fundamentals should be given even greater consideration. Creating content is one thing. But editing or even completely deleting (without it still lingering somewhere) seems to be more of a luxury.

With centralized systems, one never knows if there might still be a copy somewhere. With decentralized systems, it seems even impossible. At least for now. However, this does not render this age-old principle obsolete.

The next big "system" would be a decentralized, uncensorable protocol that cleanly implements C-M-D (Create, Modify, Delete).

yep

I like your posts because you often says about criticism.

I agree that this headline looks ... inadequate. It doesn't reflect this interview.

But this your posts also inadequately picture putin. looks he is all about peace and quiet. Why he invaded independant country if he wants peace in the first place?

Second - I spent last two days giving "counterarguments". I found lies and illogic in putins words. I gave specific timestamps when he said them and arguments. (I can repeat them to you if you want)

And you know what? No one needs precise arguments and logic. No one needs counterarguments. People talks raw emotions and thats it.

BTW I don't like your too "general" conclusion about all media. Somehow I'm sure there are headlines that portray Putin as a peacemaker as inadequate as this headline.

Its not about "propaganda machine" its just people like fastfood. and don't like thinking. And journalist also those people, and probably they know that if they invite professional historian who will comment putins "historical" bullshit at the beginning interview no one will understand and appreciate.

How did you integrate Matrix into Thunderbird?

I'd be surprised if they wrote this themselves. Their international stories are usually from Reuters and AP verbatim.

#Thunderbird auto starts signs me in to #XMPP, #Matrix and email all together. Yet to receive my first message on XMPP...

#Jabber