f5
A.
f5d80a9267d2340ffea77fb50089662e7d5ea44227598d144ddb6632e7858cb7
Learnt to pick my relays.

I used to believe regulatory capture is existential to Bitcoin.

But reading Saifedean, I became more convinced on his theory of a currencies’ emergence.

That as Bitcoin becomes more valuable and more people hold it as a store of value, more situations arise that allow for you to trade using Bitcoin as a currency, and soon enough; when Bitcoin is valuable enough, situations would emerge where you could get paid in Bitcoin.

Only then could anonymity on the source of the money could be attained. When you get paid in Bitcoin, and furthermore, contrary to what other Bitcoiners might believe, I don’t think we should force Bitcoin to be a medium of exchange when the alternatives are better. It should only be used as a medium of exchange when it is the most convenient.

Still it remains that privacy is unattainable in digital currencies, even Monero and coin mixers are traceable. Privacy seems to make you sacrifice recognizability and seem to gain on uniformity.

I used to be concerned about privacy, and thought that it would enable the state to censor transactions, till I got this.

Replying to Avatar Yaƫl

The Samourai Wallet developers created a tool improving privacy for bitcoin on-chain use, similar to cash. Users held control of their own funds.

Prosecutors ignored FinCEN guidance and concocted an unreasonable legal theory of liability to charge them both with breaking money transmission laws despite the tool never taking custody of the funds.

Facing millions in legal costs, 25 years in prison, an overzealous and unfair prosecution, and a Judge with no patience for understanding the broader legal and technical arguments, the developers were essentially forced to plead to lesser charges of "conspiracy" for the sake of their families.

Now, both developers have one month before they are to turn themselves in for 4+ years of incarceration, all for creating a piece of open-source code that allowed people to do want they wanted with their own money.

This prosecution is an unwarranted and unjust process of law that will be looked back on in shame. Every legal tool or resource should be dispensed in order to free them and reverse the dangerous precedent this sets for privacy and financial sovereignty.

Privacy is not a crime, and open-source developers who empower users are not criminals.

Many wealthy and powerful people today use bitcoin and cryptocurrencies to safeguard their wealth and benefit from a real-time settlement network without intermediaries. Every consumer benefits from better tech tools that allow them to take control of their money and spend how they wish.

If people of influence understand and appreciate the broader ethos of the Bitcoin and crypto revolution, rather than trading and getting rich off fees from their shitcoins, they should advocate for both the pardon of these two individuals and for legal safeguards in federal law to ensure this never happens again.

It is not just two these people's lives at stake, but it's the future of how Americans will interact and benefit from technology going forward.

#freesamourai

I don’t know a thing about this—but couldn’t this be defended as free speech? It’s software.

While AWS is down, observe the reliability of Nostr. Without centralization there is no central point of failure.

Almost the entire internet is down, and I trust that Nostr still operates normally.

While YouTube is down, observe the reliability of Nostr. Without centralization there is no central point of failure.

While surveillance is greater than it could have ever been due to the internet. The full effects of the internet have not been fully realized. Bitcoin, Nostr, and other liberators are not widely used.

I don’t think Nostr lacks normies as much as I believe it lacks the variety in opinions. I do believe Nostr is actually too homogeneous.

Volkswagen uses a similar thing to diagnose car faults.

There wouldn’t be a major difference in hardware performance if they developed a new PlayStation now, so I doubt they will.

I wish Hell existed so whoever wrote this is damned there.

Hot take that I would not say publicly: she is a really good actress, her acting skill had made the show much more enjoyable.

I will cede to that she is goddamn ugly and she does not fit the games’ representation.

Even then I bet those ants wouldn’t justify slinging cobwebs at the other ants on the other side of the line.

If an oil refinery were to pollute an environment it is destructive of the surrounding property and is judged and could owe compensation. Similarly a smoker pollutes the property, I disagree with the French government’s claim to property ownership, and its use of violence to place itself as the arbiter, besides that there is no fault in banning cigarettes in public, taking taxes is a far worse offense of our rights.

You are right, I actually started using them around the time ChatGPT came about, not because of it directly but perhaps by seeing it more often.

One other critical thing is that I wrote my thesis around that time so I knew to add it as a keyboard shortcut, which makes it more convenient and hence I now use it more often.

They are both nuclear countries. Doesn’t Mutually Assured Destruction suffice as a peace pretext.

nostr:note19k4cqm96r5j49zvufnqfrnuehqqrgqcdxqjc56pgs6yfv45nzmysyln7ap

I respectfully disagree, being a Bitcoiner myself I believe that Nostr is independent of Bitcoin.