Today marks the 31st anniversary of the siege at Ruby Ridge where government agents killed a pet, a child, and a mother rather all because one of their own made a typo on a legally binding document.
The Nostr equivalent of Tinder should be named “Nostr’ings attached”
Alby was unlocked, but somehow primal was disabled...?
I can see a single identifier being useful in determining the authenticity of someone like government official or a corporate exec because those respective institutions could issue the NIP05, but for your random normie or a celebrity how would we go about determining the authenticity of that person?
The only feasible way to make that work would be if there was a handful of services issuing sought-after identifiers, but then you're falling back into the trappings of centralization.
But how do users, particularly high profile individuals. ensure that someone isn't out there impersonating them with the same handle that uses a different NIP05?
I guess my question is more geared towards high profile persons and influencers. Would it behoove those people to claim the identifier for each of those respective services to ensure someone doesn't try to impersonate them?
Like, would Eminem have slimshady@nostrplebs that he uses for everything and be like "all those other slimshadys@ are just imitating"?
1. Awareness that nostr isn't just a Twitter/Mastodon replacement
1a. The benefit of a single identifier being used for all of the various services.
2. Consistency of features- people will wonder why can they "delete" an event or search for a key word one client but not another.
https://x.com/potus/status/1691109605278179328?s=46
Biden has the audacity to boast about offering Hawaiians a measly $700 in aid just days after requesting $24B to continue a proxy war.
The sad part is people will look at this situation and still pull the lever for this piece of shit.
Would it be sensible or necessary for a user to have a NIP-05 identifier for each service they contribute to and/or consume?
For example, should a user have an xyz@twitterequivalent, an xyz@youtubeequivalent, and an xyz@pintrestequivalent? Or is the idea that a single xyz@nostrplebs would carry over to each and every service?
#asknostr
Y'all are being hoodwinked.
Would you look at that! The domain was also registered in July of 2023. July 11th is roughly a week after the now infamous video went viral. 
Awfully convenient that the account was created the same month the episode occurred. 
Called it!
Marketing exec has an episode that goes viral and then publishes a PSA promoting mental health services. 
nostr:note18a68w727myughzcgczaklqfzh6drz6jps6jrf9fpdvrljspnmcms0np6yk
Would there be a reason why clients and relays wouldn’t adopt NIPs that permit edits/deletes?