Like it or not, #Trezor #Coinjoin is the best solution out there!

Catchy name, right, #plebs?

I finally submitted my 4 and half pages long article about this controversial feature of Trezor's cold wallets.

I would like you to read it, share it and subscribe to my Substack! It's free - I let you, my fellow #nostr #plebs decide if it has any added value since this is our way in #Nostr space.

Here is one quote of myself I think packs a punch:

"There is no real issue to use chain-analysis prior to coinjoin as it was already present. The real reason why we do coinjoins is to clear the history for further use." ...and Trezor is doing a fantastic job I might add.

Now go read that article about #Bitcoin privacy. Enjoy!

Like it or not, #Trezor #Coinjoin is the best solution out there!

Catchy name, right, #plebs?

I finally submitted my 4 and half pages long article about this controversial feature of Trezor's cold wallets.

I would like you to read it, share it and subscribe to my Substack! It's free - I let you, my fellow #nostr #plebs decide if it has any added value since this is our way in #Nostr space.

Here is one quote of myself I think packs a punch:

"There is no real issue to use chain-analysis prior to coinjoin as it was already present. The real reason why we do coinjoins is to clear the history for further use." ...and Trezor is doing a fantastic job I might add.

Now go read that article about #Bitcoin privacy. Enjoy!

The shitstorm that was triggered around Trezor due to the implementation of CoinJoin is really incomprehensible. I understand the controversy regarding the coordinator zkSNACKs rejecting certain UTXOs, which I don't like either, but the reaction of certain parts of the community is completely exaggerated.

That matter does not affect your anonymity once you enter the CoinJoin. Your funds are still fully under your custody. The chain surveillence company cannot know your identity after you CoinJoin...

And by the way, the code is open-source, you can create your own coordinator that does not blacklist those UTXOs and persuade Trezor to use it.

I fully support Trezor. It is still, in my opinion, by far the best hardware wallet on the market. And I think their decision to implement WabiSabi 2.0 was right. Or rather the best possible one, under the given circumstances.

I like both Wasabi and Samurai. Both solutions have their advantages and disadvantages. And I think, in the case of Trezor, the advantages outweigh the disadvantages with WabiSabi (and not with Samurai's Whirlpool).

The shitstorm that was triggered around Trezor due to the implementation of CoinJoin is really incomprehensible. I understand the controversy regarding the coordinator zkSNACKs rejecting certain UTXOs, which I don't like either, but the reaction of certain parts of the community is completely exaggerated.

That matter does not affect your anonymity once you enter the CoinJoin. Your funds are still fully under your custody. The chain surveillence company cannot know your identity after you CoinJoin...

And by the way, the code is open-source, you can create your own coordinator that does not blacklist those UTXOs and persuade Trezor to use it.

I fully support Trezor. It is still, in my opinion, by far the best hardware wallet on the market. And I think their decision to implement WabiSabi 2.0 was right. Or rather the best possible one, under the given circumstances.

I like both Wasabi and Samurai. Both solutions have their advantages and disadvantages. And I think, in the case of Trezor, the advantages outweigh the disadvantages with WabiSabi (and not with Samurai's Whirlpool).

Hey nostriches, anybody here who understands coinjoins background in details?

I have a question concerning address re-use.

1) Please have a look at this video and please comment those who understand that problematic.

Was this Wasabi 1.0 or Wabisabi 2.0?

2) Is it technically possible that address reuse can happen?

3) Please, only constructive information, no beef between 2 sides. I don't seek for a information what is better...

Thank you