Nostr Web Client

I’m not aware of a setting in Primal. Yea, Nostur and Damus by default tag and notify everyone involved when you reply in a thread, with the option to deselect specific users if you don’t want to tag everyone. I wouldn’t mine having the option to reply to everyone in a thread on Primal, but I also like that my notifications don’t get noisy seeing replies that aren’t directly to me.

Replying to

I didn't feel insulted or bothered. You're reading too much into what I'm saying. I'm afraid you don't understand the economic theory, nor the point I am making. I'm basically saying you're right, but I am clarifying the points for precision. I even said they are NOT universally applicable. If you can't understand that, THAT'S a you problem. I'm only an amateur economist, what do I know about economic laws?

Lol wtf does that even mean, “amateur economist”? 😂

Replying to

They are true descriptions. But human action changes the game. That's how economics always works. You don't have to talk to me like I'm an unthinking redditor. Economic laws govern everything, and yet individuals govern what economic laws will apply to them at any moment.

Notice that I didn't say EVERYONE will or should hoard ALL their bitcoin. I merely implied it's a natural tendency, it tends to often be the rational thing to do in current conditions for a lot of people.

I will talk to you how I want, just as you will do the same toward me. If you feel insulted by me being direct with you, that’s a you problem. Get used to it or get lost. 🤷‍♂️ Neither of these (Gresham or Theirs) are laws, as a law is universally applicable. It is stupid to refer to them as such, especially since they contradict each other and yet are both referred to as “laws.” Do they describe human behavior in some circumstances? Sure. Are they universal laws? No. At best they are perhaps hypotheses

Replying to

It's one example of price controls in supply and demand dynamics, which are very much real.

What I gave was merely a hypothesis because it's not really an example of Gresham's Law except that dollars are overvalued compared to basically all other goods, so all other goods are gonna be hoarded in as much as the people who understand money will use them as money.

But Gresham's Law is certainly true.

I will see your Gresham’s Law and raise you a Thiers’ Law. 😂 My point is, these are just made up “laws” that don’t actually control anything. At best they try to describe behavior, but they aren’t actually laws at all. Do what you want with your money. You can just ignore Gresham and Thier.

Replying to

royster⚡️

Idk man looks like the bottom pic has a lot of horsepower

SO MANY USE CASES

Replying to

They are using it as money. Gresham's Law states that artificially overvalued money will drive good money into hoarding. That's still a monetary use. Dollars suck and are overvalued by the welfare warfare state, so the law applies sort of indirectly here even though there is a free market exchange rate between dollars and bitcoin. People want to get rid of their shitty fiat by spending it.

Blah blah blah muh GrEsHaM’s LaW 😂 It’s a hypothesis at best.

Replying to

SuiGenerisJohn

lol, "privacy"

Replying to

I lost mine in a boating accident.

🤝😂

Replying to

nostr:nevent1qqsvpq6g77weplcsdegn0rrz4cndghk3qshmghqwjmdzx7a23yc3yzcpzemhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuurjd9kkzmpwdejhgelnj5t

That’s not what I’m saying.

Too late bro. I already sold it all.

Replying to

Silberengel

😂 I legit built that. I write notes to myself. They just sit on the relay, for me to read later, but nobody else sees them.

Excellent 😎😂

Replying to

This works in theory, but reality doesn’t back it up. Case in point: miners not redirecting hashrate despite clear forensic evidence that most of the smaller pools in the top 10 are just AntPool proxies - meaning a handful of people control what goes into 70% of mined blocks. On top of that, we’ve seen miners stick with pools even when those operators are actively attacking Bitcoin (spamming the chain and bloating the UTXO set). And if that wasn’t enough, we’ve got yet another example: miners refusing to switch pools even when they could earn 10–20% more in rewards, like with Ocean. In short, theory tells us one thing, but the actual behavior of miners (or should I say hashers?) keeps proving the opposite.

Clearly you’re the expert here. We should all just give up. Bitcoin is dead.

Replying to

Sourcenode

Music to my eyes

😂😂

Replying to

Not defending the Monero bros shitcoin, but it’s important to recognise that the same thing is possible to happen to Bitcoin *today* as well. Most Bitcoiners simply don’t realise 51% attack is possible even without 51% of the hashrate. Foundry can do it. AntPool can do it. They just haven’t decided to go that route.

Corn, I see you made it to Bussin'&Buzzin' w/ nostr:nprofile1qythwumn8ghj7cmjv4shgu3wdehhxarj9emkjmn9qythwumn8ghj7erfwfjkxar0wfuju7tpvf6jumt9qqsftzm4fgwnmed4ajs0uvwj642lg5fjt7zf32pa5xvhkl7dtsu73rq6udlsx

A few thoughts on this in no particular order:

- pools don’t directly own/control their hardware and hash rate, so it would require prolonged collusion among their participating miners

- the cost would be prohibitively astronomical even if they somehow convinced their miners to participate

- the incentives just don’t line up at all

- it’s good/necessary to practice adversarial thinking, while also important to be mindful of reality when doing so

Replying to

SuiGenerisJohn

Yes sir! Best haircuts on nostr