Sounds similar to Wire transfers (vs ACH) in the US. Costs, but all the security work on the bank's part is up-front before they tell you it's sent. I had to send one a while back (down payment on a house) and my bank waived the fee, and it showed up quick. Not Bitcoin quick, but still, quick.
The picture is actually a spider web from my carport a few days ago, because I didn't take any pictures today, but #proofofwalk

And backup your keys...
Maybe it's supposed to be undergrad only? I'd push Architecture up a bit, and maybe physics down, but it depends on the point. Earning potential? Difficulty? Likelihood of getting a job in the field?
In my experience at least 75% of them think they're the former...
I was asking for recommendations, so nothing wrong with self-recommendations. I'll check it out, thanks!
Personally, I use 21 sats (21 because of the limit of 21 million bitcoin) as a "like".
Not even slightly triggered, and I don't mind reading it. Just suggesting you broaden the arguments. Please think of it as constructive criticism.
Not that I disagree, but not a strong argument for the growing part of the population that's not Christian.
100% on keeping it in the hands of users. But I also like the idea of making it easy to fall into the "pit of success" as far as moderating your own environment to be something we want.
It seems to me we already have most of this native-built with parameterized replaceable lists, so there's no need to go outside of Nostr for it at all. All we'd need is a few more contexts such as "always-hide", "always-show", "always-obscure", as well as a list-o-lists type that basically allows me to publish a set of lists that define my experience.
Then all that would need to happen is for clients to support it, and most users to be at least a little polite about tagging their content.
And, as a bonus, if it's super easy to swap them out, we could better understand the experience of others by basically seeing Nostr through their eyes by temporarily taking on their lists. So if someone is complaining about all the X content, we won't be tempted to say, "I don't see any X, you must be making it up, and instead I can look.
If a client were to offer settings something like movie ratings when you first sign up, and set defaults based on that as far as relays and content warning certain hashtags, that seems like a reasonable place to start.
The biggest flaw I see with it is that not every client supports shared relay lists, so you may get a rude surprise if you use a new one. And with time that will improve.
I'm giving up, my reference material doesn't help with the runes themselves, and I'm more familiar with the Elder Futharc.

Great, I was about to go to bed, but now I have to translate that...
But, now I need to reread that book.
Isn't that almost exactly the opposite of what we (well, at least I) want out of nostr?
Marketing Departments don't help. Case in point: Microsoft. Do you want the XBox One X, or the XBox Series X?



