nostr:npub1l0uneskvz7l53vx766vcyk2l9me47r4fcc5yfdzzzd6m43sw76yq4prhn4 used to, something like a year ago, but has stopped since. So not worth it for him.
Mailcow is pretty cool, it's a dockerized stack for running a mail server (with rspamd, webui, etc). Pretty easy to setup and configure. What u was struggling the most with was the spam configuration. A lot of inbound mails were going to spam. Also, big mail providers tend to blacklist mail servers ran by individuals on vps, etc. Check this article out https://blog.lopp.net/death-of-decentralized-email/.
Really like this one!
So many possibilities. For example #[3] was thinking about a decentralized PGP identity registry, where you use RGB single use seals to track the validity of PGP keys. You "bind" a key to an output, and if it is spent, the PGP key is considered revocated.
You can have utility tokens (no trading value, that have a fixed BTC value) to enable more things for DLCs.
Those who want to play with NFTs (wtf I know but there are a lot of ppl lol), they can have them off chain, the data being available in Storm.
Offer's still up, don't hesitate haha
I guess I tried 😂
nostr:note1mz2pwdhf8wthg7z4y9uy4yaer7m258cwued04nxtpw4lt9ezh7mqzhzpnm
Not yet, RGB is a big piece to integrate, and the last consensus breaking changes have just been released. I think 2023/2024 will be good years for RGB 😁
Pv ☕️
If you have any questions about LNP/BP and RGB, feel free to ask them and I'll try to answer 🔥
Mostly client-side validation. You only know of the contracts you are involved in, and you validate the state that concerns you yourself (e.g. if you receive an asset, you verify the history of the coins by going back through the state transitions).
Bitcoin L1 is used as an ownership layer and to commit for state transitions. But these transitions can also happen in a Lightning channel.
They just released rgb.tech if you wanna take a look, but for more advanced details I'd recommend rgbfaq.com.
#bitcoin
I am sorry, but bitcoins are meant to be spent and transacted. If one feels anxiety doing a transaction and if that anxiety prevents they to transact, I don't see really how they can use Bitcoin. We need to educate people feeling that anxiety, not to reduce the number of transactions they make. I don't really feel like this is a good argument 😅
I agree that self-custody should be the norm, but I don't think using centralised exchanges with KYC should be.
Gm pv ☕️
#[0] Really not convinced about providing KYCed on/off ramps in the future Blocks' wallet app. Shouldn't Blocks just concentrate on self-custody with its open hardware wallet? I feel like we really shouldn't make KYC the norm.
Gm! Can't wait to be in London for Advancing Bitcoin this week!
Mmh, it inserted the note. I have surely misunderstood something lol
All good for the note but I still see @ #[0] for the user (I guess?)