Shout out to nostr:npub126ntw5mnermmj0znhjhgdk8lh2af72sm8qfzq48umdlnhaj9kuns3le9ll for StartOS. Lost power yesterday for a few hours. My node (BTC and Lightning) went down in a very ungraceful manner. When I booted up again this morning everything caught up and synced just fine. 🙏
I know this was mostly down to bitcoin-core and lnd but I've had the same situation nuke an Umbrel setup twice so it was a huge relief to also have a clear UI to watch all the logs update and verify things were back to normal.
Umbrel is very very fragile, indeed StartOS seems more solid
Primal is good, just needs to have Bunker login option to be very good.
Tried Nostros a bit and liked the UI, but it's not as good as Primal or Amethyst.
Yep, but it does require to break down the copied link etc. Maybe the request is to simply have a paste like in primal
What are your plans then?
“All the ships are sinking.”
“There is no gold in the vaults.”
-Andreas Antonopoulos 🐜
👇🏻
Current amount of Canada #Gold Reserves: 0.00 tonnes (Zero)
#bankofcanada 🇨🇦 🍁
Study #bitcoin https://video.nostr.build/1f56d7fce29265cda0b0b04b42c6f09a5792272dda20158af81581590b6b96d8.mp4
This video is the less tasty nothingburger that I came across. The fella actually said nothing, but acted as he did.
You still have to validate when shitcoining transactions are included in blocks, so I guess there is no **real** difference.
Does #Nostr count as Media?
I do not agree.
Little premix: I use LN everyday and I consider myself pretty savy about it. I like it, i like the business opportunities that it creates, like the UX of good LN products. L2 is not only LN, agreed, but we can only talk about what exists, so I'mm refer to it.
1) If you cannot settle a channel balance onchain, you are not sovraign. If you hold a 100'000 sats UTXO onchain, at fee peak you weren't economically able to spend it without draining more than half of the UTXO in fees. These are truths. The result of it is that in the future 100k sats could be a good amount of money, but maybe fees will be no high that it does not make sense to hold UTXO onchain.
2) The World is made of people that cannot go about their days always thinking about bitcoin and the majority don't even have the opportunity to save enough to buy some sats, I cannot imagine them buying a UTXo and paying fees high as hell. These guys will be relegated to higher layer solutions, without the change to settle onchain.
I'm not advocating for on-chain scaling, don't get me wrong. But the virtue signaling in our industry must take into account reality. Some halfway reality checks would be very very healthy.
Ecash is magic!
Clean, easy to use clients and plenty of good content are the key points for #Nostr adoption.
Some brilliant people are already working on clients, what we need to do is focus on the good #content and make it normie-friendly.
If you would like to see something on Nostr, just write a note and add the hashtag #wannasee, then follow the hastag. We need to contaminate ourselves with ideas, and then act.
I have a go
I #wannasee:
- personal vlogs
- educational content on biology and science
Agreed, I also add one more reason and that is you can't truly own these fiat assets. Someone else has private keys.
Once you know the power of true private ownership, everything else feels like a scam.
https://freemansperspective.com/why-i-no-longer-invest-in-stocks-and-bonds/
How will the narrative of self-custodiality change when (not if) owning a UTXO will be pretty much impossible for plebs?
Just asking
Reasonable, we should make something happen to signal what we're willing to see on Nostr.
Hastags? #wannasee
Some kind of chat group?
Dunno
Shall we start using the invite-obly relays technique? Let's suppose that I have a relay: I'm willing to accept new pubkeys to use my relay only if they're invited directly by one of my already-subscribed pubkeys. Lets's put a 2 or 3 maximum invites per pubkey.
In this way we would have a relay in which only "known people" hang out, no bots, no fkng harassments.
Just a trash idea maybe, because content discovery would be much restricted.
I agree, we need make sats flow way more into the real economy.
I cannot agree with the supply-demand reasoning: the fiat money acceptance is NOT subject to supply-demand rules...you just HAVE TO accept it, no demand-driven acceptance. By not demanding to spend our sats we simply lower the supply of sats-payable services. No "fiat-supplied services" number is increasing, full stop
Nostr needs more non-bitcoin related stuff I guess.
You have to trust mints
Gente reminder that is happens also on messaging platforms like Telegram. Stay safe out there, use Simplex or you XMPP server if you'r willing to put into the work
This is dumb that makes the fella actually comedy genius.
If Bitcoin "iS a ScAm" everyone holding it should be willing to flip it to anyone else willing to pay the price. This is estremely far from the truth.
Again, comedy genius.


