Avatar
Luke Dashjr
fdd5e8f6ae0db817be0b71da20498c1806968d8a6459559c249f322fa73464a7
Roman #Catholic*, husband, father of 11 children, #Bitcoin Core developer, and CTO @npub1qtvl2em0llpnnllffhat8zltugwwz97x79gfmxfz4qk52n6zpk3qq87dze ; INTP (*not to be confused with pedos)

Looks like NIP 57 requires LNURL which is inherently centralised... 😥

How long did it take? I'm at 400-500 after a few days.

Yes. A well-designed client shouldn't have a performance hit from NIP 5. But you really only ever want to make these requests via Tor IMO.

Perfect way to troll someone, right?? Who would choose cake after getting hopes up for steak? XD

No, this is nostr.

Signal is a centralised phone app.

Looks like poor design of the protocol tbh. When I follow someone, it signs the full list of everyone I am following, rather than having one "event" per follow...

Worse: This gives them an excuse/justification to bypass the network. So we lose the clarity of miners bypassing it as being obviously malicious.

In any case, it still spams Bitcoin, twice as much now. Harming Bitcoin is not a solution.

Oh, that's what I meant. So it should be possible to provably count zaps, right?

Seems like a major flaw... What if Amazon wanted to let you pay the merchant directly, but still handled order confirmation and delivery?

Even if you set it up that way intentionally? What if you route through a server designed to confirm the payment?