Avatar
Luke Dashjr
fdd5e8f6ae0db817be0b71da20498c1806968d8a6459559c249f322fa73464a7
Roman #Catholic*, husband, father of 11 children, #Bitcoin Core developer, and CTO @npub1qtvl2em0llpnnllffhat8zltugwwz97x79gfmxfz4qk52n6zpk3qq87dze ; INTP (*not to be confused with pedos)

* With the current state of mining centralisation, IMO it would be pretty dumb to send any bitcoins to a drivechain. There are better ways to burn bitcoins or donate to miners.

* But it's not my place to dictate what you can/can't do with your bitcoins, so if there's sufficient community support for drivechains, it should be available for those who want to use them.

* Drivechains were arguably a good idea back in 2017 with the risk of bcash splitting off, but that ship sailed a long time ago. I don't think there's a point now.

* Yes, L2L is funding my work on drivechain code. The code/PR is not an endorsement of drivechains. Many Bitcoin devs receive funding for their work. This is not substantially different.

Yes. I guess "directly" isn't strictly correct since he was in the middle (my point was that it DID need to go through Musk to get resolved)

Bandwidth usage is why I only use nostr at home (usually)

I miss the algorithm too. I don't want to have to follow everyone manually

BTW this isn't about drivechains. I'm neutral on that.

What about all the people I hear can't get IDs (hence we can't require it to vote)?

To be fair, Trump did get rid of Roe

It does change things significantly.

Within marriage, you can't just walk away and find someone else.

(Divorce isn't real)

That's a feature, not a use case

Came here looking for answers.

Found everyone else is basically in the same boat. πŸ˜“πŸ«‚

Liquid is multisig to begin with... The point is they're transparent with the security model unlike Ethereum which pretends it's something it really isn't in practice.

(Also, IIRC those backups aren't actually accessible by Blockstream without the functionary giving it to them - they're encrypted so the functionary can't use it alone: it functions as an effective 2-of-2)

I've always had it off. Still crashes like crazy

That's a 51% attack, since the transactions are legitimately anyone-can-spend, as enforced by virtually all full nodes.

If the attack were interpreted as a softfork, that would not only mean miners get to dictate the protocol, it would also mean almost nobody runs a real full node (ie, enforcing ALL the rules). In other words, a fully centralized system.